Where are the statistics?
Where is the evidence?
This is nonsense, not evidence.I’ve been watching this site
it’s RCS simulations based off the geometries of the aircraft, which is not difficult to calculate
just because it makes your ass sore does not make it nonsense
https://www.safety.af.mil/Divisions/Aviation-Safety-Division/Aviation-Statistics/
you can compare mishap rates for fighter aircraft here, F-35 is lower than F-15 and F-16
The models are very bad.They have poor quality.Bad geometry
they line up almost exactly with sukhoi’s patents, the Su-57 just has RCS more similar to LO 4th gens like super hornet than true 5th gens
Sukhoi’s patent is not an approving document.This is a document for an abstract plane.All RCS are kept in the strictest confidence.And morons like you compare the minimum hornet RCS with the average one listed in this patent
that’s cope if I’ve ever heard it
when you repeat easily debunked myths like the F-35 being accident prone I have no reason to regard you as anything less than a blind propagandist (notice how you didn’t respond to the source I provided that easily proves this myth wrong)
What is the source?This is shit, not a source
Or Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection - #5141 by AUSChalkWarrior ???
It doesn’t open
One way out of this situation…
Freedom Texas… Texas will be free!
if it doesn’t open that’s your issue, try a VPN
it’s the US air forces archive of accident data for all its aircraft, of the fighters listed the F-35 has the lowest rate of accidents
Lay off the krokodil and paint thinner, misha
Also the lowest mission readiness for the same time in service as older aircraft, so ?
But I’m really not going to argue in the F-35 vs XYZ thread, they’re going nowhere.
f35 is ugly su57 is pretty
end of discussion.
With the opening of the devserver we’ll be able to see if they’ll improve the fulcrum regarding its fm, instructor or missiles.
Chances are minimal but there’s always a glimpse of hope =)
F-35
F-18 10^3 m2