Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2)

so tell me since when you can take 15% fuel in WT

guess what 30% fuel is

1 Like

True, it is 30%, holy cow

Holy big missiles

3 Likes

We finally get the peak-looking loadout… this feels like the final stone of the gauntlet.
Kh-31 are the coolest Russian/Soviet missile imo, they look so unique

3 Likes

No R-37M no party, the last missing comically big missile

1 Like

missing the Kh-35 aswell
image

3 Likes

Ah true! Hopefully will come with the MiG-31BM SOON™

2 Likes

Is the R-27 ARM in the game or just files?

Anti-Ship Kh-38 right? I forgor

no, kh38 is a rocket, kh35 is a cruise missile.

You probably saw man, Rafale got detailed model, those snecma engines look fire

nothing beats the MiG-29Ks avionics block with a fuel tank tho
image

1 Like

Ah alright, anyway really cool-looking missile

Nah didn’t see as I haven’t gone on the dev server. Pics are in the Rafale channel I assume?

System fire final boss

1 Like

Nope, not that I saw

1 Like

Can you send pics? Maybe in DM as it may be off topic

MiG-29K 9-41R to be renamed MiG-29KR 9-41R:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Nbe7Zi4cwfOr

RD-33MK should be smokeless report has been accepted:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jFYC6lPFaYK2

RD-33MK producing to much after burner thrust report has been accepted
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/RwHZXLZONVbq

MiG-29K landing gear issue report has been accepted:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/fxIsHNkGH10N

R-77-1 report has been denied since devs do not plan on adding it:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YjRBvVNXhzg5

1 Like

based, hopefully RD-33K will also get it.

A nerf, but i rather have it closer to real life values than overperforming.

I thought so, Gaijin most likely gonna place MiG-35 there with R-77-1 because it doesn’t really fit any higher br with mechanical radar and limited amount of missiles and countermeasures

3 Likes

now we wait and see how much channel loss it ends up with, probably in around the same % wise as the MiG-29M or a bit less probably

1 Like

Well, air intakes have the same design, but MK engine features FADEC, so it should technically help to get more performance?