Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-29 Fulcrum - History, Design, Performance & Dissection (Part 2)

so its an absolutly irrelevant graph

man if there was only a graph with known fuel loads

1 Like

1 Like

Good thing I didn’t own this pfp:
images-13

70fxez

this graph is dogshit, the max g load with 20000kg mass is 8.5g, not 8g as here
this graph says the max su27 g load is 8g, this mean mig29 is better at all speeds more than 750kmh

ah yes going faster than 750 kph means you pull more Gs
and the STR graph is totally not going further than 8Gs in the Su-27SK manual

and the su-27 is totally not able to sustain 9Gs
oh wait another page from the document you posted says it is
image

and its totally not like th Su-27 had a soft limiter like the Mig-29 so it couldnt exceed 8Gs at all

and having to go to a higher speed to pull the same Gs is actually a good thing

the mass is 22.8 tons
a whole 2.8 tons heavier than you said
image

yes its not

only at low fuel mass

from the very same document you got your graph from

.,

are you braind?
you cant even read a graph correctly

AND AS I SAY, THIS IS CALCULATED DATA, THIS DATA IS NOT TRUE FOR BOTH OF THEM

no, its not. according to this graph

max g load with 22.8t mass will be 7.83 at 820 kmh, when the graph shows 8.5

you keep making statments without sources

and whenever someone brings a source contradicting your opinions you start throwing around insults

even then the mig-29 is worse than the flanker

and your source is that you made it up idc
the graph shows clearly the the Su-27 perfoms better than the mig-29

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️
image

this graphs is not true and outdated

reason?

1 Like

Son

iam very clearly seeing a mass of 20tons there and not 22.8

this is a formula 🤦‍♂️

and the graph is still for a given weight

but sure do that to determin how great the Mig-29 will perform at 20tons

or how bad the Su-27 will be at 13tons

image

Goofball

like i said