Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25BM Foxbat-F — The Soviet Wild Weasel

Would you like to see MiG-25BM in-game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters
  • As a Premium Vehicle
  • As an Event Vehicle
  • As a Squadron Vehicle
  • As a Tech-Tree Vehicle
  • I said No
0 voters

MiG-25BM “Foxbat-F”

Introduction

The MiG-25BM was the Soviet Union’s dedicated Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses (SEAD) variant of the famous Foxbat platform, developed to eliminate NATO surface-to-air missile systems, using Kh-58U (AS-11 Kilter), from high altitude and at high speed. It combined the raw engine performance of the MiG-25PD interceptor with the ground-attack flexibility of the MiG-25RB series, offering a potent strike platform capable of operating deep into enemy airspace while evading or neutralizing radar threats.

Importantly, this jet could carry FAB-250M/500M-62T unguided bombs and R-60 series IR-guided missiles, which is why I’m making this suggestion, even while acknowledging that, at the time of writing, SEAD is not currently a feature in War Thunder. I’m simply proposing a MiG-25 that represents the RB family as a whole, so that Gaijin doesn’t add multiple separate variants.

Most MiG-25RB bombers historically lacked both missile capability and flare dispensers, which would make them relatively limited and unengaging to play in War Thunder. In contrast, the MiG-25BM not only retained full bombing capability, but also had the ability to engage enemy aircraft with R-60 missiles. As a late-production variant, it could have also been equipped with flare dispensers, making it a far more versatile and survivable option compared to ALL earlier RB models.


Design & History

Spoiler

The MiG‑25R series originated in the 1960s, when the Soviet Union sought a high-speed, high-altitude reconnaissance platform to match its interceptor cousin, the MiG‑25P. The initial MiG‑25R model was designed purely for strategic photographic and electronic reconnaissance, exploiting its ability to fly over Mach 2.8 at altitudes exceeding 20 km to evade interception. It carried sophisticated cameras and basic ELINT equipment to survey enemy installations and troop movements deep behind front lines.

Building on this, the MiG‑25RB variant (Razvedchik-Bombardirovshchik, or Reconnaissance-Bomber) was introduced in the early 1970s to add a high-speed bombing capability. It retained the cameras and reconnaissance gear of the MiG‑25R but incorporated a specialized navigation and bombing system that allowed it to release free-fall bombs at very high speeds and altitudes with surprising accuracy for the time. This dual-purpose role made the RB particularly valuable for both strategic reconnaissance and high-risk strike missions against important targets that might be heavily defended.

The MiG‑25RB family spawned several specialized reconnaissance variants, each tailored to specific intelligence-gathering roles.

Special equipment of the reconnaissance-bomber variants:

  • Aerial cameras: A-70M, A-E/10, A-72, S-45-ARE, and the NA-75 night camera;
  • General electronic reconnaissance stations: SRS-4A, SRS-4B, or SRS-4V (on the MiG-25RB);
  • SRS-9 “Virazh” (on the MiG-25RBV);
  • “Tangazh” system (on the MiG-25RBT);
  • “Kub 3M” electronic intelligence station (on the MiG-25RBK);
  • “Sablya” side-looking radar (on the MiG-25RBS), or “Shompol” (on the MiG-25RBSh);
  • “Shar-25” electronic reconnaissance station (on the MiG-25RBF).

The MiG-25BM was specifically derived from the MiG-25RBK. Like its siblings, the BM replaced the interceptor’s radar with specialized systems in the nose designed to detect, track, and engage enemy radar sites. Unlike variants such as the RB or RBSh, the BM did not feature conventional optical cameras or ground-mapping radars, focusing instead on a dedicated SEAD role using anti-radiation missiles and conventional free-fall bombs. Structurally, the MiG-25BM was distinguished (from other RBs) by a nose section extended by 0.72 meters.

RB modifications are equipped with the “Peleng-D” targeting and navigation system (or “Peleng-DR” / “Peleng-DM”), which includes:

  • the IKS-8 inertial-heading system;
  • the DISS-3s “Strela” Doppler drift and slip angle sensor (later replaced by DISS-7 “Poisk”);
  • and the TsVM-10-155 “Orbita-155” digital computer.

The MiG-25BM is equipped with the “Yaguar” targeting complex, which includes the “Sych-M” detection and target designation system.

For the purposes of War Thunder, however, the specific reconnaissance or targeting equipment housed in the nose has negligible gameplay impact. Visually and structurally, the MiG-25BM is nearly identical to other aircraft in the MiG-25RB family, with the only notable external differences being found in the nose section, which varied depending on the specific RB variant and the equipment it housed. And naturally, the BM was equipped with underwing pylons to carry the Kh-58 “Kilter” missiles, unlike other RB-series jets which carried either bomb racks or nothing at all.

Unlike their interceptor counterparts, which were typically painted in bland finishes optimized for high-altitude operations, the MiG-25RB-series bombers (Including BM) were occasionally seen in distinctive camouflage schemes. These liveries not only reflected the aircraft’s ground-attack and reconnaissance roles over varied terrain but also gave the RB variants a tactical appearance compared to the sterile, high-altitude look of their interceptor brethren.


Armament & Combat Capability

Spoiler

Although best known for carrying Kh-58U (AS-11 Kilter) anti-radiation missiles on dedicated pylons, the MiG-25BM retained the standard RB-series bomb pylons, allowing it to carry a conventional bomb load. Soviet MiG-25RB bombers typically carried up to 8/10 × FAB-250M-62T or FAB-500M-62T 500 kg bombs. The FAB bombs used by the MiG-25RB family were specifically engineered to withstand the extreme heat generated during high-speed, high-altitude flight. Their engineering choices allowed them to remain stable under the intense aerodynamic heating experienced at supersonic speeds. However, despite this, the safe operational bombing speed was still limited to Mach 2.35, as exceeding that could risk damaging bomb fuzes or compromising structural integrity during release.

These bombs were typically distributed across four underwing and four under-fuselage hardpoints, forming the standard 8-bomb configuration used by the MiG-25RB family. However, at least one loadout schematic of a MiG-25RBT depicts a configuration with 10 FAB-500M-62T bombs, including six mounted under the fuselage. The Soviets did possess pylon configurations capable of carrying three to six bombs at a time (MBD3-U6-68), allowing for dense ordnance loading on a limited number of hardpoints. However, one source claims that instead of mounting three bombs on a single or two triple pylons, an additional double pylon was installed to accommodate the extra ordnance. This configuration, however, lacks any confirmed photographic or visual evidence to support it. Given the shared structure and hardpoint arrangement between the RBT and the BM, it’s plausible that the MiG-25BM could also support this enhanced loadout. It is also said that some RB bombers were equipped with S-24 unguided rockets, although there is no visual evidence of this, but it remains plausible.

As for the wing-mounted bombs, the RB series employed two mounting configurations: one with two bombs positioned side by side (MBDZ-U2 pylon) on a single pylon, and another more aerodynamically refined setup that staggered the bombs in tandem (MBDZ-U2TK pylon), one behind the other. The latter configuration reduced drag and improved high-speed flight characteristics, particularly during supersonic bombing runs. On the MDZU-U2 pylon, the right bomb was released first, followed by the left. In contrast, on the MDBZ-U2TK tandem pylon, the rear bomb detached first, with the front bomb released afterward.

More importantly, there is strong circumstantial evidence that the MiG-25BM could carry R-60 infrared-guided missiles for self-defence. The outer pylons on the MiG-25BM are structurally identical to those found on other MiG-25 variants, allowing for standard weapon compatibility. MiG-25s modified to carry R-60 missiles were fitted with a primitive optical gunsight, mounted on the canopy windscreen frame at eye level. Most likely an ASP‑PFD‑21 or a closely related variant, this type of sight was installed in a similar configuration on the MiG-21PFM. This supports the possibility that the BM could carry R‑60M “izdeliye 63P”, likely mounted on twin-rail adapters similar to those used by the MiG-25PD. The MiG‑25BM may have also been capable of carrying R‑40T/TD infrared-guided missiles. This gave the aircraft a minimal but effective ability to counter interceptors during high-risk missions near enemy air defence zones. Though it lacked internal cannons or dogfighting agility, the MiG-25BM’s combination of speed, altitude, bombs, anti-radiation capability, and missile-based self-defence made it an aggressive and high-risk strike platform, designed to strike deep, fast, and at extreme altitude.

Read the first link in the sources section for more details on cockpit equipment.


Kh-58U (AS-11 Kilter)

Spoiler

The Kh-58U, known in NATO as AS-11 “Kilter,” is a long-range Soviet anti-radiation missile developed to destroy enemy radar installations as part of SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defences) operations. Evolving from the earlier Kh-28, it uses solid-fuel propulsion for greater reliability and performance. The Kh-58U variant, introduced around 1991, improved on the original Kh-58 with extended range, up to about 250 km when launched from high altitudes, and better guidance accuracy.

The missile weighs approximately 640 kg, has a length of nearly 4.8 meters, and carries a 149 kg high-explosive warhead designed to disable large radar sites with a single hit. It relies on a two-phase guidance system: inertial navigation guides it during midcourse flight toward the radar’s last known location, while a passive radar seeker activates in the terminal phase to home in on enemy emissions. Capable of speeds exceeding Mach 3.5, the missile can be fired from platforms like the MiG‑25BM, Su‑24M, Su‑22M4, Su‑25TK, and various Su‑30MK versions. It saw early combat use in the late 1980s, notably with Iraqi forces against Iranian Hawk sites, and has since been used in conflicts like the 2008 Russo-Georgian War and the ongoing war in Ukraine, where it has reportedly targeted systems such as Buk and Osa radars.

The MiG-25BM was purpose-built to carry and deploy the Kh-58 (or Kh-58U) anti-radiation missile. Unlike earlier Soviet air-to-radar missile concepts that were extremely heavy, the Kh-58 offered a more practical solution and became the centrepiece of the BM’s offensive capability. The aircraft was fitted with four missiles mounted on AKU-58 launch rails under the wings, and guided using the newly developed “Yaguar” targeting complex. This system included the “Sych-M” passive homing sensor, the “Beryoza-L” ELINT station, and ECM pods such as “Siren-1D-0Zh” and “Lyutik”. During state testing between 1977 and 1980, the Kh-58U demonstrated high accuracy, often hitting its targets even after radar sources were shut off mid-flight. With a launch range exceeding 40 kilometres, the missile proved exceptionally effective.


External Fuel

Spoiler

The MiG-25RB type aircraft could be fitted with a massive external fuel tank that carried more fuel than the internal capacity of a MiG-23, significantly extending its operational range without severely compromising its high-speed performance.


Countermeasures

Spoiler

The only confirmed chaff and flare dispensers ever equipped on MiG-25 variants were the BVP-50-60 pods, mounted over the wings. Each pod contained 30 KDS-155 cartridges, providing effective countermeasure coverage. This configuration is clearly visible on this model of an Iraqi MiG-25PD/PDS aircraft. However, in the context of reconnaissance MiG-25s, they were only supposedly equipped on the MiG-25RBF. There is no visual evidence confirming that the MiG-25BM ever carried chaff/flare dispensers, although it remains plausible, as the BVP-50-60 pods were designed to be mounted in place of the aerodynamic wing fences found on all MiG-25 variants.

MiG-25BM came equipped with SPO-15 “Beryoza” radar warning receiver, enhancing its situational awareness against enemy radar threats. Some later-production models also featured additional antennas mounted near the engine intake nozzles.

The RB aircraft are also fitted with electronic countermeasure (ECM) stations: SPS-141, SPS-142, SPS-143, or SPS-151.


Flight Performance

Spoiler

The MiG-25BM had the powerplant of the MiG-25PD interceptor, however shared the same airframe structure as its RB-series bomber counterparts. It was powered by two Tumansky R-15BD-300 turbojet engines, each producing 11,200 kgf of thrust with afterburner, enabling a maximum speed of Mach 2.83 at high altitude. The BM series could also utilise the R-15BF2-300 turbojets, each rated at approximately 13,000 kilograms-force of thrust with afterburner. However, operational limitations during strike missions typically restricted the aircraft to around Mach 2.35, in order to avoid overheating or damaging bomb fuses and pylon hardware. R-60 missiles, when carried, were rated for use at speeds up to Mach 2.5(Although the R-60 missiles used on MiG-25s were reinforced to withstand greater heat and aerodynamic stress).

The RB-series bombers, including the BM, were designed to perform high-speed, high-altitude bombing runs. A typical mission profile involved flying at 2,500 km/h and releasing bombs from an altitude of 20,000 meters. From that height and speed, bombs were released at a stand-off distance of approximately 38.8 kilometres, taking just 76 seconds to reach their target, underscoring the aircraft’s emphasis on survivability through speed and altitude rather than countermeasures or agility.

Contrary to popular belief, flying at Mach 3 and above in the MiG-25 did NOT result in permanent or irreparable engine or airframe damage. Such extreme speeds primarily reduced the service life of the engines and certain airframe components, but did not destroy them outright. In 1971, it was reported that a MiG-25R conducting a reconnaissance mission over Israel operated at full throttle to escape an interception. Upon landing, the canopy sealant had melted from the extreme heat, and ground crews were forced to pry open the cockpit with a crowbar to extract the pilot. To generate such levels of thermal stress, the aircraft must have been flying at speeds estimated around Mach 3.6, approximately 4,445 km/h, surpassing even the operational speeds of the SR-71 Blackbird according to official statistics. If verified, this would represent one of the fastest manned aircraft flights in history.


Summary & Implementation

Spoiler

With around 40 aircraft built/converted, the MiG-25BM represents a fascinating and underrepresented branch of Foxbat development, a dedicated SEAD aircraft capable of destroying hostile SAM sites, executing bombing missions and defending itself with short-range missiles. Its blistering speed and altitude performance would make it a unique asset in high-tier gameplay, requiring careful planning, altitude control, and hit-and-run tactics.

It should be noted that the MiG-25BM, being part of the RB family, featured a slightly different wing structure compared to the P/PD-series interceptors. Specifically, the RB series had a shorter wingspan of 13.38 meters (compared to 14.06 meters on the P/PD variants) and a wing area of 61.4 square meters, tailored for high-speed, high-altitude strike and reconnaissance missions. Despite these structural differences, the BM shared the same engine capability with the PD series, offering similar performance in terms of speed and climb rate.

The inner pylons on the BM also differed in design from those on the PD series. However, this difference does not affect bombing capability, since underwing bombs are typically mounted only when these pylons are removed entirely. The outer pylons, by contrast, appear to be identical to those used on the P/PD variants, making them compatible with a range of weapon types. The Kh-58U “Kilter” missiles were carried using special adapter racks, which could be removed and replaced with mounts for other weapons, such as R-60 infrared-guided missiles, depending on the mission profile.

If implemented, the MiG-25BM should feature a functional third-person ground-attack reticule to support high-speed bombing runs. It should also offer a 10-bomb loadout option to fully utilize its ground-attack potential. For self-defence, the aircraft should be equipped with infrared-guided missiles, such as the R-60, to give it a fighting chance against enemy aircraft. While the inclusion of chaff and flare dispensers may be speculative, due to lack of photographic evidence, it remains a highly important feature for gameplay balance at its likely battle rating. Furthermore, once SEAD mechanics are introduced in War Thunder, the MiG-25BM should absolutely receive its historical anti-radiation missile loadouts, such as the Kh-58U, to fulfil its intended suppression role. Without these core features, the MiG-25BM would struggle to stand out as a meaningful or competitive addition to the game.

The current ultimate War Thunder loadout would be 8x FAB-500M-62 bombs, 4x R-60 missiles for self-defence, plus chaff/flare dispensers. Carrying two extra 500kg bombs (for 10 total) with R-60s will likely cause an overload, so with 10 500kg bombs you might not be able to carry R-60s. Once SEAD mechanics are introduced in War Thunder, the aircraft could be equipped with 6 × 500 kg bombs, along with 2 Kh-58U anti-radiation missiles for SEAD roles and 4 R-60 missiles for self-defence.

In the end, these decisions are at Gaijin’s discretion.


MiG-25BM “Foxbat-F” – Full Specifications

Spoiler

General Characteristics

  • Role: SEAD / High-speed strike and escort suppression aircraft
  • Crew: 1 (pilot)
  • Length: 22.27 meters
  • Wingspan: 13.42 meters
  • Height: 6.00 meters
  • Wing Area: 62.40 m²

Weights

  • Empty Weight: 20,600 kg
  • Normal Takeoff Weight: 37,000 kg
  • Maximum Takeoff Weight: 41,200 kg

Powerplant

  • Engines: 2 × Tumansky R-15BD-300 turbojet engines
    • Dry Thrust: 2 × 86.3 kN
    • With Afterburner: 2 × 109.8 kN

P.S If Gaijin wish to enhance the MiG-25BM’s performance further, they could consider equipping it with the engines intended for the MiG-25M project, the R-15BF2-300 turbojets, each rated at approximately 13,000 kilograms-force of thrust with afterburner.


Performance

  • Maximum Speed: 3,000 km/h+ (Mach 2.83+)
  • Cruising Speed: 2,345 km/h (Mach 2.2–2.3)
  • Service Ceiling: 24,000 meters
  • Rate of Climb: 208–214 meters per second (about 41,000 feet per minute)

G-Load Limits (Overload)

  • Sustained maximum G-load (MiG-25R): 3.8 G
  • Alternative reported sustained limit (MiG-25R): 4.5 G - 5.0 G
  • Absolute structural design limit: 11.5 G (not achievable in practice, structural limit only)

Range

  • Ferry Range: 3,200 km
  • Combat Radius:
    • At supersonic speed: 1,635 km
    • At subsonic speed: 1,865 km
    • With 5,300-liter external fuel tank:
      • Supersonic: 2,130 km
      • Subsonic: 2,400 km

Avionics

  • “Sych-M” (Сыч-М) detection and targeting system

    • A passive radar receiver designed to detect, identify, and track radar emissions from enemy SAM systems.
    • Functioned similarly to Western RHAWS (Radar Homing and Warning Systems).
    • Provided target coordinates to the missile system (Kh-58U) via the targeting computer.
  • “Yaguar” (Ягуар) targeting complex

    • The fire-control and guidance suite built around the Sych-M system.
    • Managed missile targeting, launch parameters, and threat prioritization.
    • Integrated with the aircraft’s mission computer and cockpit displays.
  • The RB aircraft are fitted with electronic countermeasure (ECM) stations: SPS-141, SPS-142, SPS-143, or SPS-151.

  • Radar Warning Receiver: SPO-15 “Beryoza”

  • Countermeasures: Chaff/flare dispensers (BVP-50-60 with KDS-155 cartridges) (Plausible(Unconfirmed))


Armament

  • Air-to-Air Missiles:
    • 2–4 x R-40T/TD IR-guided missiles
    • 2–4 × R‑60M “izdeliye 63P” IR-guided missiles
  • Air-to-Surface Missiles:
    • 2–4 × Kh-58U (AS-11 “Kilter”) anti-radiation missiles for SEAD missions
  • Bomb Load (Conventional):
    • Up to 5,000 kg of specific, high-speed, general-purpose bombs (FAB-250M-62T or FAB-500M-62T)
    • Configurations with 8–10 bombs possible, using underwing and under-fuselage pylons
    • S-24 rockets (Plausible(Unconfirmed))
  • Maximum Payload Capacity:
    • Up to 5,000 kg

Video


Sources

Spoiler

Cockpit MiG-25BM

Авиация и время 2004 05 [Журнал «Авиация и время»] (fb2) | КулЛиб - Классная библиотека! Скачать книги бесплатно

MiG-25BM (Foxbat F) :: Ruslet

Самолет-разведчик МиГ-25РБ

Уголок неба ¦ МиГ МиГ-25БМ

Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 & MiG-31 Foxbat / Foxhound - History, Design, Performance & Dissection

MIG-25 FOXBAT

МиГ-25Р / РБ / БМ FOXBAT-B, -D, -F | MilitaryRussia.Ru — отечественная военная техника (после 1945г.)

[1.0] MiG-25 Foxbat

6 Likes

I think the MiG-25 will be a balance problem, one because it’s way too fast for a lower battle rating and two their weapons limits themselves for something not higher than a battle rating 11.7 in my opinion during this current compression.

I might be lost here, but is there any MiG-25 focused primarly in close-to-medium ranges engagements, perhaps long range aswell? This is what concerns me to what battle rating it will be while sharing distinct characteristics: great speed but close range weaponry.

So is there any evidence of the BM carrying countermeasures? It seems that was only a PD addition.

+1 for a TT vehicle

3 Likes

+1 love the Foxbat, hopefully in the tech tree.

3 Likes

Soon i will be able to make my wargame red dragon soviet deck in WT.

+1

2 Likes

Seeing as Gaijin seems to be willing to add CM pods to all F-5As and Es (even if they didn’t use them IRL), I’m gonna wager that Gaijin would probably add them to any Mig-25/Mig-31 that gets added.

4 Likes

Also +1, would be nice to have a Soviet equal to the F-4G Wild Weasel V/Advanced Wild Weasel!

2 Likes

Only if gaijin ever add the F-4G

1 Like

That’s not a great argument. I’d really rather not repeat that mistake of the F-5C. Plus, the F-5C received countermeasures because they were structurally identical to the F-5A. The MiG-25BM and PD are more different.
Fictionalizing countermeasures for this aircraft just because just isn’t a good path to go down. For that matter, it seems that R-60 carriage is also unsubstantiated.
Soviet SEAD aircraft would be great but this just ain’t it. Instead there’s a wide variety of 3rd Gen strike aircraft and 4th gen multiroles that carried Kh-31P, Kh-28, Kh-58/U, and Kh-25PS/MP/MPU.
I should also note that the MiG-31s do actually have countermeasures.

What I have information from @Savage_Virus_R6 one MiG-25RB had KDS-155 countermeasures and since BM is directly based on the RB version, there is no technical limitation.

3 Likes

The Yak-141 is also a good example. There is literally no reason why the MiG-25BM couldn’t get countermeasures when the MiG-25PD carries them (there is no technical difference that would prevent them from being used on RB/BM) and supposedly the RB variant (experimentally) had them too.

3 Likes

Not sure with BR but this plane can be pretty good to fill gap between Yak-28B and MiG-27. We will get the legendary MiG-25 aircraft and also close the gap - double win.
image

5 Likes

Frankly quite disappointed that War Thunder players seem to prefer completely fictional aircraft configurations over an accurate portrayal of such an interesting aircraft. I would think we’re better than WoT/WoWP.
Can you at least specify that the configuration presented is speculative at best? As it stands this is a highly misleading and incorrect suggestion…

@Savage_Virus_R6 can you please state here that source which tell about countermeasures for MiG-25RB? I think that Yefim Gordon had stated that for RBF variant.

I was having a nice holiday, and then this Mr fun at parties comes along and starts providing incredibly constructive and useful feedback.

So I downloaded WT onto my tiny laptop and had to play 3 games with my Ha-Go Commander on ultra-low just to come back here and repeat everything that was said in my suggestion.

1 Like

Right, here we go.

First off, there’s absolutely zero structural difference between any of the serial MiG‑25 wings, so if they’d wanted to fit flares to the BM, they easily could have. Debunked: The RB and P wing structures are indeed different.

Second, the MiG‑25RBF does in fact carry flares according to the source I cited, I’m not making it up. If you’ve got questions, take them up with that author, not me.

Third, multiple sources confirm the MiG‑23BM was armed with R‑60s.

Please, read the suggestion in full, check the sources, and then start your feedback.

P.S Now, if you’re after “realism,” go play DCS. There’s nothing ridiculous about my suggestion. In fact, the third paragraph of the introduction clearly explains that I chose the BM variant because I don’t want to see a MiG‑25RB lumber around with only dumb bombs.

1 Like

The plane you are looking for is called a MiG-25PD

Another forum post is not an acceptable source. Suggestions need to be supported by primary sources such as manuals or authored secondary sources. Not what some guy said online, here.
This doesn’t change the fact that countermeasures were never mounted on the BM and the claim of R-60s is still unsubstantiated. Of your sources only one mentions R-60s- as a claim by Western sources that contradicts Soviet sources.
Sure, they could in theory have added countermeasures or R-60s. But they didn’t. They also could in theory add a radar and R-40s. Or added carriage to R-73s. But War Thunder isn’t a game of coulds and you don’t get to just make up how you wish the aircraft was like.
Also I would like to note that there were infact structural differences between the wings of the interceptor and bomber models:
image

Not to mention that there needs to be wiring and then instrumentation in the cockpit. Mounting a countermeasures dispenser isn’t as simple as bolting it on the outside of the aircraft.

This suggestion should probably be taken down by suggestion moderators for a lack of sources.

The suggestion only requires two sources to confirm that the aircraft existed. Moreover, several past suggestions have been approved based solely on photographic evidence. I recommend reviewing the community guidelines for clarification on this point.

Here are three sources mentioning that it carried R-60 missiles, supported by the fact that it used at least the outer MiG-25P/PD pylons, which are clearly visible in the images.

https://www.airwar.ru/enc/fighter/mig25bm.html?utm_source

https://ruslet.webnode.cz/technika/ruska-technika/letecka-technika/a-i-mikojan-a-m-i-gurjevic/mig-25bm-foxbat-f-/

I’ll give you this: the MiG-25BM did not indeed share its wing structure with the PD-series interceptors. Instead, the RB and P-series variants each retained wing designs specific to their respective families.

Based on currently available evidence, the BM did not carry chaff or flare dispensers. However, it’s worth noting that the BVP-50-60 flare pods, when fitted, replaced the aerodynamic boundary layer fences on the upper surfaces of the wings, a feature present on both wing types.

Besides, the following source claims that all Iraqi MiG-25s had chaff/flare dispensers. The Iraqis did operate RB-series jets, including the BM.

The decision to implement flares ultimately rests with Gaijin.