Tom Cooper sources are dubious at best and generally omitted from bug reports the same way Janes is for that very reason
We are so back. Support this everybody:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JYls1faLEq27
3 Likes
Oh hey its me! :)
3 Likes
They denied the report again. What a joke.
“Same source as the previous report. There is no additional source to review.”
Maybe if you’d actually read what the source says then you’d see that the previous report was actually correct. I don’t even know where to go from here it’s at a point where they just actively ignore information given to them.
If anyone knows if there’s any other way to get this looked at it would be nice. Maybe someone I can message or something
7 Likes
You can try sending a dm to one of the technical moderator, so that one of them can take a look at it.
1 Like
It is well known that they don’t read or they are not able read the reports. It happened to me once that I reported incorrect vehicle names in the game and then I got a message that the error had been fixed. When I checked it, I found out that they had only fixed half of the submitted list. So I wrote to the moderator again that they had only fixed half and he wrote to me that they had fixed everything that was in the report. I had to literally draw arrows for them in the original list, showing what they had fixed and what they had not. Luckily, they were able to read the arrows so they fixed it afterwards. I think this will be a similar case.
@EstrogenKitten Try looks here if here wont be something useful for this case:
https://disk.yandex.com/i/hNgOhrbeBpPXdQ
Looks like page 11 can be useful.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Self explanatory, really
You seem to be new around here if you think stupid usernames will mater, the report being denied has nothing to do with the username it’s just how it is, look at the Su-27 saga or the MiG-29.
Contacting a tech mod is the best for now because the manual straight up contradicts the response given.
We literally had a my little pony April fools event on war thunder, it doesn’t get worse then that.
2 Likes
I’m just busting your guys balls don’t worry, I don’t mean much by it, just thought it was funny these are our champions for the mig23.
As a reminder for those who think that bug does not exist:
Translation:
The “BS” modes (“BS3”, “BS2”, “BS1”) are recommended for use with the parametric amplifier enabled. The radar system remains operational in “BS” modes even under mild weather conditions; however, in this case, the detection range is slightly reduced, especially during attacks on targets flying above the fighter, and tracking interruptions may occur.
The F-5 manuals straight up contradict the in-game performances. They are not a bug because Gaijin has modeled the mas they intend to, and that is that. There is no fighting it further.
Of course they have their explanations, but that is just a facade. If you insist on wasting your time with the reports feel free, but I suggest you put that faith elsewhere.
My faith was with the DCS MiG-23 but that went up in flames.
It was in flames the moment Razbam decided to take on the project. They have made nothing good.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
After that last one you got answer?
2 Likes
weird