That completely makes any of the following information invalid / irrelevant.
The K/D ratio of the MiG-23ML series (even against the Iranian Tomcats) is around ~2:1 so it has the best loss rate of any MiG series when the bomber or third world export models aren’t considered.
Quoting DCS would be like quoting random users on this forum as a source. It’s not one. It’s not primary, secondary, or tertiary. Any information on their forum (like this one) needs to be backed by a source and not taken at face value.
While I agree that it would mostly struggle the flight performance between the MLD and the F4F/Tornado is gigantic. The MLD was not hit nearly as hard as the other MiG-23s, and even if it got nerfed by 12% like the other two should, it would still outrate the F-14A when comparable fuel time is selected (9 min on MiG-23 is around 20 min on F-14A when in full AB). If the MiG-23s radar would ever get fixed the MLD would need to go up by quite a bit in br.
Again - I’ve had no issues dogfighting the gen4s in it. If you’re gonna lose the fight in the MLD you’ll also likely lose it in the Su-27. Neither is well suited for combat at the BR.
Though it’s rare you need to dogfight now anyway. The ordnance upgrade is the only necessary piece and would play similarly to the J-8F which I find quite fun to play personally.
Not really, your arrogance is quite famous in this forum.
Recent incident with Gunjob proves this really well, as for your “airframe doesnt matter” claim, its compeletly lie.
You only perform good on J8F is due to bein 13.0 which makes it see 12.0 mm regurarly, i do the same thing with JAS39A and Mig29G cause i like bullying Tomcat abusers.
And your “actual” top Tier Service record proves my point, you’re not that guy.