MiG-29 with R73 and R27R instead of the R27ER

They used that loadouts for training and mission at peace time i can search for some photos if you want

1 Like

Nah its alright, I get what you’re trying to say

1 Like

27ER is as historical as R-60M, R-73, etc.
They’re all historical.

Thus it’s not an argument to make.
The ONLY argument to make is about how missiles augment the airframe performance and the BR it’ll be.
The Mig-29’s flight model is one of the best 12.7 flight models in-game.
If you want me to support the removal of ERs to reduce the BR to 12.3? Sure.
I will not support R-73 though as we ALREADY HAVE Mig-29s with R-73s.

I see @strzelec213 is telling everyone to ignore facts again, derailing the topic again.

Irrelevant. That doesn’t change its status.

Yes i mean i was talking about early service years of migs in soviet union and time to it’s collapsed

1 Like

You are beyond wrong, read a little bit more and some more research before commenting :)

1 Like

As i tell you earlier show me any MiG-29 9.12 with R-27ER and find something to prove it. Then we can talk

1 Like

I think neither should have R-27Es. All MiG-29s except the SMT should have R-27R and R-73, at 13.0. This would be historical. It would be a bit of a nerf for the G, but I think it can handle it. The 27R and ER are similar in performance in the short to medium range where the MiG-29 is actually useful, because of its terrible radar it’s not very effective at BVR anyways. In fact, the R might even be better in a very short-ranged dogfight because of the lower acceleration

2 Likes

@0minutes
Have fun proving hundreds of people wrong then.
Certainly you’re the only correct person on the planet…

Prove the F-16C can fire AIM-7F+ and prove Mig-29 can fire R-27ER.
I’m not the one that made these claims, the flight manuals are, which are OEM primary source documents.
The same manuals that tell you Mig-29 9.12 are R-73 compatible.
Also…

Got this from the WT forum too.
“But that’s a 29SMT.”
Prove its weapon management system is different from 9.12.
“It shows on an MFD.” That is a display for informing the pilot of things, not the system itself.
“It uses a newer radar.”
Radars are not weapon management systems. The reason F-16A ADF can fire all AIM-7s F-model forward is because of its radar modes. F-16A ADF’s 1980s weapon management system also sees all AIM-7s as the same thing whether it’s an AIM-7F or AIM-7P.
So you have to prove that the weapon management system can BOTH see R-27R and ER as separate missiles, and be unable to fire the latter. Cause the radar can fire both, they both use the same pylon, and R-27ER manuals showcase its compatibility with legacy Mig-29s as a way to keep them in-service without upgrading them to R-77 firing standards.

And refer to this:

I just won’t sit idly by to arguments nor support arguments whose foundations are incorrect.
Make a better argument to support your position.

Even an argument like this is better:
“I want R-73s on all Mig-29s cause I prefer those missiles.”
Already better than falsely claiming that historical accuracy is not historical accuracy.

Totally agree

The flight manuals of the MiG-29 (9-12) say that it can only carry the 27R

The 9-12 had a different Radar?

Almost every electronic devided was different XD

Oh Alvis u are so wrong with that “letter” and still i don’t see that photo and 9.12 with ERs.

The MiG-29 can in fact fire the R-27ER, as it can fit on the pylon and has the same seeker as the R-27R and communicates with the radar’s fire control system in the same way. The MiG-29 was not issued R-27ERs when they came out as they were made primarily for the Su-27. The 9-13 and 9-12 were not issued R-27ERs in large numbers if at all, and the foreign users of the MiG-29 (such as Germany or Romania) never upgraded from the R-27R as it came out after the fall of communism.

The SMT has a completely different radar and fire control system. It doesnt affect its ability to fire the R-27ER, but allows it to use the R-77. Same reason why the Su-27SM has an upgraded radar and different fire control system.

1 Like
  1. What is legacy MiG-29 for u because we all don’t know which one for you is that misterious legacy mig.
  2. No they are not compatibil with old 9.12 and 9.13
  3. They kepp them in service for other reason like money

As stated here, the radar isn’t the limiting factor as it’s already known to fire R-27Rs.
And ER’s seeker is identical in guidance method to that of R-27R.

Just like how AIM-7C - E-2 have the same guidance method and even AIM-7F having a CW illumination guidance feature as well.

This has to be proved. R-27R uses the same seeker tech. It’s still an R-27 missile just like how AIM-7F is still a CWI-capable AIM-7.
So you have to prove it’s incompatible, like you’d have to prove that F-4E cannot fire AIM-7Fs if you wanted to attempt that.


So I repeat that I support a Mig-29 9.12/9.13 with only R-60Ms and R-27Rs for 12.3 to further differentiate them from 29G and SMT.

However, 13.0 MiG-29 is not that bad, especially since Russia has a slightly larger gap between MiG-29A and MiG-29SMT so, they can add R-73 + R-27ET to the current MiG-29A(9.13), and add the original 9.12 model with R-60M + R-27ER instead as new vehicles.

It bears repeating: the more viable options, the better.

1 Like

A MiG-29 with only R-60s an R-27Rs would be incredibly handicapped in performance. They should get their historical loadouts of R-73s and R-27R/T. That way they are still competitive without eliminating the incentive to go for the MiG-29G (R-27ER/ET) or MiG-29SMT (R-27ER/ET, R-77 + better radar).

6 Likes

MiG-29 4 early sub variants MiG-29 (9-12A), MiG-29 (9-12B), MiG-29 (9-13) & MiG-29G never launched R-27E

MiG-29S (9-12S & 9-13S), MiG-29M (9-15), MiG-29SMT (9-17) and MiG-29K (9-31) support R-27ER & R-27ET

In fact MiG-29SMT (9-19) armed R-74M, R-77-1 & retrofit R-77M like MiG-29K (9-41R) and MiG-35. but not ready R-74M & R-77M this year

I might want R-27R & R-27T replace with R-77-1.

2 or 3 years R-77M instead R-27ER & R-27ET, add R-74M and decompressing max BR to 14.3 or 14.7

1 Like

Not for 12.3.
And R-60Ms is still a historical loadout.

R-73s would make them 13.3 in the next decompression.
There are already other Mig-29s with R-73s, just use those. They’ll ALWAYS be the same BR as a 9.12 with R-73s if they lack R-77s.