MANPADS Missiles and Overload: The Technical Details

Dare I say they did and many choose to ignore that because it either doesn’t fit their agenda or they’re past memories. Whatever will get them the most upvotes.

6 Likes

You are shot down more times from the “striel” vehicle than from its Chinese counterpart, maybe that’s why?

I now use Striely myself and as a user I believe that it is completely broken and contradicts most of the laws of physics, especially considering that it is a very old technology that is “unrealistic” at that time.

Very often I feel guilty shooting down enemy planes with this broken vehicle, the missile can make a zigzag in the air

reminds me of the UFO Flight Model the Mig 19PT had for over 6 months

Thats hypocracy and both of us are better then that.

No need to deny how other nations overperformed on certain areas.

No one is arguing here that gaijin “calculations” if can call it that, are right. The overwhelming majority of the dudes here are just in chock that they could just admit their double standards to our faces.
The point in question is you trying to derrail the topic with useless discussions about diferent vehicles and what not, and when proved wrong, gaslighting everyone else saying that we are attacking you because you dont like gaijin. Just stop it.
We have a expression in Brazil for what you are doing: “morde e assopra”, literally speaking “bite and blow” or “criticize and praize”. You turn arround the whole god damn topic about manpada being wrong, you say “manpada need fix”, but then you say “well but gaijin is right in x, y, z and w subjects” that are not even in discussion here, and when proved wrong or being told to stop you say “stop attacking me for saying gaijin wrong”. Thats just stupid and doesn’t help anyone. Grow the fuck up.

12 Likes

Ok, with my (un)proffesional opinion, this topic derailed hard. We should calm down and keep it on topic to avoid unnecessary consequences.

3 Likes

I’m not. Again I repeat, I’m only against the notion that there’s bias. I haven’t disregarded their ridiculous arguments in this post. Read my first and second comment again if you have to.

İ didnt accuse you to denying that part.

You misunderstood.

Oh my bad then o7

1 Like

Oh, I forgot to respond to this.
I missed his post on that thread.
Thank you for fighting the good fight with us.
Flame & I have been good to each other, and I’m glad he’s still active.

@Darkreaper
Good, then we’re all in agreement that Gaijin’s calculations may have been wrong.

I didn’t bring up other vehicles, in-fact I only responded once to some things.
Praise is still criticism if it praises a specific feature.
If I praise a dog for bringing back a fetched object, that is criticism as well, as it informs the dog any other way is inaccurate.

Quit gaslighting people in every thread.

3 Likes

tell him lil bro!

There they come. Brace yourselves

Why are you interfering something that has none of your business?

İ basically told him he misunderstood that part and he realized that.

Stop acting like a drama Queen.

OK, after catching up with this topic, i deem it a mess in its current state and in leaving untill it calms down, see you all around

Dude that is the literal definition of gaslighting…

5 Likes

Apparently that’s the buzzword of today…
No one is gaslighting.

You are inadvertently gaslighting.

3 Likes

No.
What I did was be a little hyperbolic. @Kanelikainalo
There, now you know the words to use for next time I be a bit too hyperbolic, cause I’ve been reducing my hyperbolic tendencies for the last year thus far & continuing to do so.

Definition of gaslighting for you: “Gaslighting is the action of repetitively (and often brazenly) lying to someone to manipulate, and ultimately control them and the relationship.”
I will remain sincere & honest, and ultimately I don’t want to seriously impact your lives in any manner.