They’d probably intentionally limit the range of ARH seekers too, to give less time to defend
stats are stats? what does that even mean?
have you even played both of them? if not you should’nt talk about things you dont know
Like we have stats u cant argue with that
Spyder has the worst kd from the new spaas
im guessing you havent played either one then, when will people learn player statistics dont represent reality
they probably wont properly model IIR like they have done for the SAMs
they will just be Gatewidth + Seeker shutoff combined
I can have opinion on a vehicle i doesnt play
I saw gemplays and i faced both vehicles
no, you really cannot
I’d be down with 15.0 for the AESA EFT and Rafale (and Gripen E I guess whenever they add it) with current IR missiles so that some of fhe other AESA planes can be added without instantly being DOA on their own BR.
With these planes at 15.0 planes like the J-10C, AESA F-15C/F-16/F/A-18E etc could still be added at 14.3-14.7.
Adding the new IR missiles would bump all of these BRs up 0.3-0.7 of course.
september 21, update is not here yet?
Because it’s currently the weekend and we had a dev server late last week?
3 Likes
i remember simulator mode had D point when i used my me-262
So there is a small chance to see the M1A2T?
1 Like
Hopefully it arrives at the same time as the Thai VT-4 for the Thai line inside the Japanese tree or both not at all.
1 Like
Hopefully they dump a massive update for China and Taiwan; their tech tree felt empty when there are more things to be added.
4 Likes
I’m not against China getting the M1A2T.
It was mostly a jab against a large part of the Chinese community. They are against their export tank going to other tree but will gladly take export vehicles from other nations into their own.
Thailand should get the VT-4 into its line in the Japanese tree and Taiwan should get the M1A2T in its line in the Chinese tree.
5 Likes
they want the special variant of export only pretty much. The Taiwanese M1A2T is basically an Sep V2.5. It also has an more special armor different from the original one and redesigned for tropical enviorment. Also looking foward to the F-CK 1 and bunch of Cloud Leopard the autocannon variant, and the 105mm variant.
1 Like
I really dislike this whole “you got something new last patch” attitude when it comes to new additions.
Sure yeah, speaking for AA now, China got denied a new system because “they just got one”. When it’s a system that should probably have been added alongside Pantsir.
Or when China got denied an air addition in December patch because they “just got Mirage 2000”. Like, lol?
A content dump patch for PRC/ROC TT is in fact necessary. I’ll put it bluntly, China is China. It should not be held to the same standard, say, Israel, Japan and Sweden is held to.
1 Like
More like SEPv1.5 no? From what I saw people post it’s an M1A1 hull with a SEPv2 turret? (Not that it matter much as SEPv1 and SEPv2 are identical in game besides the forced TUSK II).
It doesn’t have the improved armor package of the SEPv3 as far as we can see, so it’ll likely be identical to the SEPv1 in game.
For gameplay perspective, this is true. Plus the RCWS I guess, not like that matters beyond being a shot trap.
1 Like