Major Update “Tusk Force” - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

I think people are over-estimating what htey will be like.

In terms of kinematics, we alreayd see what they will be like with the MICA

In terms of seekers, theyd be no stronger than those on the SAMs.

And no missile in game has anywhere near the seeker performance it should have.

Aim-9Ls for example should be unflareable in pretty much any aspect if you are sat on reheat. Ive seen pletny go for flares even in a short range rear aspect shot against something hot on AB

1 Like

the R27’s should honestly be worse, the R27ER had an atrocious hit rate, worse than early sparrows in Vietnam

Well the answer is, as always, we’ll see what gaijin does.
Maybe I am fearmongering but based off of irl knowledge of IIR performance, the current 16 vs 16, 14.3 matchmaker would not be able to deal with that threat

Was thinking more IR rather SARH/ARH

the 9B is probably about right, not much else though

Probably because we are just using adapted IR code of the code originally written for the 9B years ago.

they will beat MICA in short range, at least AIM-9X and IRIS-T

Claiming the 9X would is pretty optimistic, the IRIS-T however will be an absolute demon within 10km

in a dogfight the 9X is going to beat the MICA

We’ll see

notch gate for sparrows are already correct
image

1 Like

Fair enough then

The issue is probably that chaff is badly modeled

I’m not sure whether or not chaff is over or underperforming, haven’t looked into it. seemingly a lot of people overestimate alot of these radar missiles, saying stuff such as “radars should be unnotachble even look up with chaff” lol no

They are probably not entirely wrong. At the very least I doubt modern radars would be tricked by chaff as instantly as they are ingame. If “turn 90 drop 1 chaff” was really that effective, we wouldnt need things like BOZ pods

Let alone the fact that a lot of radars should be switching between radar modes to maintain the lock far more than they do currently.

They’d probably intentionally limit the range of ARH seekers too, to give less time to defend

stats are stats? what does that even mean?
have you even played both of them? if not you should’nt talk about things you dont know

Like we have stats u cant argue with that
Spyder has the worst kd from the new spaas

im guessing you havent played either one then, when will people learn player statistics dont represent reality

they probably wont properly model IIR like they have done for the SAMs

they will just be Gatewidth + Seeker shutoff combined