Major Update “Tusk Force” - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

i was just being sarcastic

2 Likes

Most of the lend lease stuff for Britain you can add

2 Likes

On that topic - What would be the best way to report a vehicle having severe inaccuracies/being virtually completely inaccurate with its’ 3d model?

I guess I might just specify the vehicle here;
The Begleitpanzer 57 mm has a bunch of issues on the hull (which are probably still reportable via CBR, I estimate around 8-10 reports total) but the turret and breech are so inaccurate that the amount of reports required for e.g. just the turret would exceed any reasonable figure.

And reporting the entire thing (breech or turret) in a singular report would be canned due to both upload- and characterlimits, aswell as not being able to use embed-images - unlike the forums, but as far as I am aware, it’s not allowed to solely link a forum-thread a report either…

Just explaining which parts are wrong and how that becomes evident via irl-images, blueprints etc. would already exceed the CBR’s characterlimit, let alone listing all sources and the appropriate corrections etc.
(Estimates are; ~15 (+/- 5) reports on the breech & ~20 (+/- 5) reports on the turret).

And not gonna lie India isn’t much better than the copypaste subtrees…

1 Like

So KF-41 won’t appear. Nothing to ask ,we will get same answer in any question in this direction. We aren’t specie like China that can block WT for such, that’s why we can’t have special treatment.

2 Likes

Hey @Smin1080p_WT

is there any chance the US could get a TT M8 Greyhound in the future.
Diffrence could be that it features the ring mount with a .30cal Browning instead the high pintle mount with a .50 cal browning like the event one.

I just really want a version with that ring mount.

9 Likes

USA really should have a proper techtree one.
Also a Grant for the British…

1 Like

what nation?

Belgium under France.

day 13 of waiting for more domestic chinese vehicles and not exportslop

So you guys don’t want other people to have your export vehicles, but then don’t even want them yourselves, interesting.

Why is this the image used in this report?

image

And it got accepted too in record time. I get that the proof for the report is in the link but why add this image in?

Also with the client version as 1.2.3.4.

7 Likes

Sometimes, we need these goofy posts, makes life a lot more interesting

3 Likes

The F4E also needs the F4E cockpit…

1 Like

Firstly, why not?

Secondly, IIRC doesnt the reporting system require a screenshot image to make the report? Most people just put the missing system, thinking outside the box to be noticed by senpai is pretty smart.

Client bit, cant say, guess the guy accepting it didnt read that as its irrelevant to the report? Im more laughing at the reporters name.

the name changed :3
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1HHBxo7nbZ9D

for non technical bugs the client version is irrelevant, and screenshots don’t matter

i chose a random photo from my camera roll :3

Nickname still awesome