Guys… German KF41, that issue is not just for Germany.
E.G.
- PZH2000 for the Netherlands,
- PV-2D for the Netherlands,
- He 112 V-5 for Japan (The German plane even has an ingame Japanese camouflage),
- Type 89b I-Go Ko for the Netherlands,
Etc…
3 Likes
We don’t plan multiple new variants of these aircraft or split down versions into different time periods / sub modifications. So not currently no.
1 Like
Its off topic here. That was the point.
thats the companys tank in that case.
Same can be applied for rheinmetal
3 Likes
thats another issue of user states not yet having them
but developer state not having them is a bigger affront
2 Likes
Yep, hope we get a Rheinmetall KF41 demonstrator for Germany too
or one of the other finished KF41 versions.
Besides the “hungarian” KF41 not specificaly being hungarian.
Greece trialed one, Australian one would be options
2 Likes
By the way Smin, is Pakistan an official Chinese subtree by now? I know China has some of their vehicles but sometimes nations get foreign vehicles without the operator being a subtree stricto sensu
1 Like
"With possibility to add in future " that was state in kf-41 devblog
1 Like
the monkeys paw curls, germany gets a kf41 in the form of a premium
I hope so, Pakistan would have a lot of interesting vehicles to add, such as their own model of Oplot, the Oplot-P.
This was prototyped specifically for Pakistan, so it should be a possible addition, even if it wasn’t adopted.
4 Likes
Its not because you dont see an entire line of lazy c&p “Pakistani” vehicles
Well,i am not against,but more likely to be tech tree
not a requirement, just saying, look at india
1 Like
That doesn’t mean anything, look at India: a subtree that is made of premium and copypaste, not in their own line
i was just being sarcastic
2 Likes
Most of the lend lease stuff for Britain you can add
2 Likes
On that topic - What would be the best way to report a vehicle having severe inaccuracies/being virtually completely inaccurate with its’ 3d model?
I guess I might just specify the vehicle here;
The Begleitpanzer 57 mm has a bunch of issues on the hull (which are probably still reportable via CBR, I estimate around 8-10 reports total) but the turret and breech are so inaccurate that the amount of reports required for e.g. just the turret would exceed any reasonable figure.
And reporting the entire thing (breech or turret) in a singular report would be canned due to both upload- and characterlimits, aswell as not being able to use embed-images - unlike the forums, but as far as I am aware, it’s not allowed to solely link a forum-thread a report either…
Just explaining which parts are wrong and how that becomes evident via irl-images, blueprints etc. would already exceed the CBR’s characterlimit, let alone listing all sources and the appropriate corrections etc.
(Estimates are; ~15 (+/- 5) reports on the breech & ~20 (+/- 5) reports on the turret).
And not gonna lie India isn’t much better than the copypaste subtrees…
1 Like
So KF-41 won’t appear. Nothing to ask ,we will get same answer in any question in this direction. We aren’t specie like China that can block WT for such, that’s why we can’t have special treatment.
2 Likes