Major Update “Tusk Force” - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Yeah… But im sure we’ll get an IFV for 8.3 instead

probs but eh

Does anyone have a screenshot of the Fw-190 rocket characteristics after their last change?

1 Like

Missile, Air-to-Air, Ruhrstahl X-4 | National Air and Space Museum range on X4 missiles is wrong

There’s quite a few CVRTs that could come now with Indonesia in the mix, with their Scorpion 90 & Upgrades.
I made a flow chart all of them. It’s missing some of the Export variants, and I need to add some more LEPs/upgrades.
But uh, there’s alot of options.

Spoiler

(Personally I’d like to see the Type 21, Stormer LPXV, and Stormer FV-925T)
Hopefully a FV101 at least next update.

4 Likes

Is that meant to be all CVRTs by the end, or just the ones that can 100% come to WT(as their operator has a home)

If it’s meant to be all by the end, will you include partial CVRTs, aka stuff that uses a CVRT turret?

Armed ones (Unless it’s a jumping off point for armed variants, e.g. FV103 and FV4333 APCs)

Going to, but I need to add the national variants first. (e.g. Emeriati Scorpions had Chieftain sights and LRFs)
I just ran out of time cause I need to go to work lmao.

Also wanted to see if anyone new of any I missed
(or dates for some I couldn’t nail down)

1 Like

Brother has too much time on his hands.

Made a whole TT of CVRTs.

Its a shame Britain doesnt produce domestic light vehicles…

/s

1 Like

They do, its called CV90 since BAE is british you silly
/s

This is true.We can pull a German and claim that cant we?

Spoiler

All in the wrong tree :P

Already happened lol CV90120 much

Wrong flag too

Be careful with this. In the XM1302 suggestion someone said that it should go to Britain because it was produced by BAE. It was produced by BAE, but the US division of BAE (along with the Bradley and M109).

Most of BAE’s US presence is just different American defence contractors they bought out like United Defence and their Bradley, as well as the AN/ALR-94 and Lockheed Martin Sanders, I even think they keep the same locations.

1 Like

That was most likely a joke because certain US mains go around claiming foreign vehicle as domestic to them, just due to the company the maker nations one was subsidiary too.

3 Likes

I’m quite a firm advocate against adding ANY sub tree to the US, we don’t need it. However, I will take those Object 478’s we purchased. Also, out of curiosity, what are some foreign vehicles people have asked be added to the US?

ive seen some ask for the ajax due to general dynamics working on it dont forget most of south korea domestic vics

IMO the only sensible one would be the earliest model of K1 tank, as it was largely designed by Chrysler and based on their M1 Abrams bid.

However, there’s really no need and likely won’t be for the foreseeable future. There’s just so many genuine US vehicles to choose from.

1 Like

LM UK has been doing variants on the Warrior CSP and Ajax turrets mounted on Boxer and Patria. I’ve seen some delightful people not understand LM UK is a fairly separate business entity to LM USA.

There was a few other things (I swear there was someone saying the US should get one of the CVRT variants cause Alvis entered it into a US competition for essentially a laugh and free product testing), but forgive me I can’t remember them right now.

3 Likes

I’m still waiting on a lot of our wheeled light vehicles. The LAV’s (the ones we actually produced/used), and not just the 25, but the 105, 150, 600, and 300. More Strykers, HMMWV’s and what not. Same with missile carriers, it’s insane to me how we only have one, and it’s not even technically TT. Could have a dedicated line just for them.

1 Like