depends if there is going to be another dev server
if there isnt then in roughly 1 week
but if there is another dev server, then around a week (or in the week) after it closes
1 Like
2 i guess
I hope they are going to add more Thai vehicles though…
The most needed sub-TT in the game for years (something for Japan) has finally come, with just 4 vehicles in total (from which most are at a br which is already full… 9.0) and just 2 unique tanks.
They should really, really work on their implementation strategies when it comes to adding a sub-TT, because just 4 vehicles, for a nation that is in dire need for more content, is really lackluster.
2 Likes
Sexton QF 25pdr lets go
3 Likes
i mean, i am not sure between japan and israel
This is why they should have picked the FV101 Scorpion and its upgraded Thai version for the Premium tank for the tree addition ;)
Brits would be happy to see the funi BESH bonking expand even further.
tbf 50% is better then pretty much every other sub tree baring SA for unique additions
but also 50% of the usual content added when a sub-TT arrives with just 4 vehicles.
If it would be the M163 VADS and M-60-TTS (WERA), then they would be unique and worthy to grind. Now its just another M163 and just another M-60, which we have already played over 2/4 nations
didnt the benalux not come with only 4 tanks as well?
BeNeLux hasn’t received its full ground sub-TT yet.
Just some additions before it got added, just like the F-5E FCU, which was added to Japan before it got an actual sub-TT.
Since we haven’t gotten any lower tier vehicles and a trailer for BeNeLux ground.
1 Like
Speaking of sub trees, when will we get the SAAF subtree already gaijin? Everyone else gets both but not South Africa, sadge.
1 Like
Didn’t gaijin state that Britain didn’t have any gaps outside of the Gripen for the SAAF to fill? I could be wrong but i thought they had an official response.
Plenty of 6.7-10.0 ground attack needed still though ;)
Impalas and Hawks galore.
1 Like
A supersonic fighter for 10.7 would fill a gap, The only one not directly fillable by Domestic additions. Could be done by a SAAF Mirage.
But Sub-TTs filling gaps is such a contradiction. Id say less than 5% of all Sub-TT vehicles added actually filled a TT gap (that couldnt be filled domestically) and many nations still have gaps despite sub-TTs being added
4 Likes
Sometimes gaijin will fill a gap then 2 months later send the vehicle up in BR killing the gap fixer in general
There is that as well, but there are plenty of examples of vehicles just added for the sake of adding them.
Bosvark and ZA-35 come to mind instead of anything between 5.3 and 8.3
Well thats not exclusive to SA tbf
Yeah, I know. But goes back to what I mean about few Sub-TTs being added for the reason they always claim for adding them
You know that couldn’t happen?
They usually packed the leopards with some copy pastes before. And they saw the tiny amount of people complaining, at startes copying leopards directly.
So the tree is “complete”