Major Update "Spearhead" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2)

boy i hope those are unique to the UHT because… theyre german… only… and the UHT was modified for those… via the THOR (tiger helicopter outer rockets) upgrade package… which the in game UHT still doesnt have…

1 Like

Any camos planned for the F16AM at all?

1 Like

Seeing that it was recently taken off in dev, Is the PIDS+ going to remain off the Norwegian F-16AM-20 or is it a temporary thing due to an issue with the system?

1 Like

@Smin1080p_WT

hey smin, do you perhaps know if the norwegian F-16AM will get its JHMCS HMD?

There’s a report for it, but it wasn’t denied or accepted

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ttG4u9qaxeZP

2 Likes

evil swedish horde came to terrorise smin with 3 questions for the same vehicle

Sweden has 2 camos for all rank 8 TT vehicles so yeah. Im curious lol they usually get nothing so i wonder if this will be the same

6 Likes

I must know if we will be hit with “The Norwegian F-16AM will not be getting the PIDS+ because we want it to be unique for Sweden”

3 Likes

Dev blog ain’t gonna fix problems that change will gonna bring with current implementation. Besides that explanations were asked before dev server even started. So that “blog” will gonna reach us after dev sever closes and changes go live with the patch?

1 Like

It’s nice that there will be a dev blog with more details, but will any of those details include the ability to control these repairs independently?

What about the ability to opt out of automatic repairs?

1 Like

@Smin1080p_WT

Is there still a planned update in some form for Submarines?

iirc, it was previously stated that there would be further information about now.

2 Likes

december update -
gripen e, sweden
j10c, china
rafale, india (uk)
rafale, indonesia (japan)
rafale, greece (israel)
leopard and abrams engines removed (usa and germany)

4 Likes

Maybe also remove its Crew and Gun

and give r73m and r77m on a su57m to russia too

Eh, an Ch-47M2 Kinschal would be enough ))))

1 Like

For that they would need the Mig-31 as it is the only plane able to launch it to my knowledge

1 Like

How am I swearing

Probably for balance or smth. Typical gaijin stuff

1 Like

I feel like a lot of the performance will be marked as “clearly marketting”, or rather should be since actual performance is iffy

Oh yes.
I’m ready to leave WT.

When I started the votes, it always been 90%+ that do not like this feature.

Hope that i’m wrong about this devblog today. But as we know how gaijin likes to destroy their naval gamemode, they will implement it without listen our feedback.

As @Cloudzy26160 said, we are in the good way to have railshooter.
IMO, i’m waiting for a total automatisation of the gameplay. Just watch the match run.

On the topic, even AB players do not like this feature, this is not only RB players.

Spoiler

image

image

image

Looks like that even on reddit players are aware of this.

Spoiler

image

4 Likes

They should be looking (implementing) really fast because both Italy and Israel can be upgraded to a longer range Spike, leaving Germany the only nation with FnF missiles with shorter range.

There has to be a compensation, either 0.3 BR decrease or 12 PARSes