By that logic Japan shouldn’t get an IFV or anymore MBT “shoulda made some”
And why can’t the US get other countries stuff through testing/sub nations like everyone gets our stuff
I keep forgetting about that
America didn’t use South Korea vehicles. Those other nations did use American ones.
1 Like
Your logic is so unbelievably twisted its actually not funny
2 Likes
So implement it as a sub nation
That is what I am advocating against, jesus christ.
2 Likes
why do you want South Korea so bad?
4 Likes
Because Samsung artillery
That’s a funny way of spelling “greed and entitlement”.
8 Likes
M109A6 or 7 or 8 or whatever is better anyway. You just want thing without having to play another tree.
4 Likes
even prototype arty like the XM2001
The K1 tanks
Abrams is better still. Just play a different tree, because South Korea isn’t and shouldn’t be part of the US tree.
2 Likes
At least K1 series should go to US since they are Abrams with some differences. And their upgraded m48
They are based on the XM1. They are not modifications of the Abrams.
Designed by Chrysler then GDLS for later variants it’s an American design, derivative of abrams
meanwhile the suspension is german and the engine and transmission
1 Like
GDLS was only really involved in the original K1 not the later variants
The XM1, which it is based off, was designed by America. America helped with the design, however South Korea did the majority of it.
1 Like
Which is why it’d provide a nice bit of variety for top tier US, would offer a few new things but have tradeoff of engine power