Because our gaijin designers like Sweden the most lmao XDDDDD
2 Likes
ah so 122 is over performing then based on that data
1 Like
Yeap
Is anyone surprised?
1 Like
so gaijin overperform(slightly) 122 armor and underperform(massively) 2a7v series based on their irl armor
The Leo 2A7V has different armor protection data, since the mounted armor is not “MEXAS-H”, but the next level of “AMAP”. Not to mention, that it uses a different armor resistance technology
Gaijin: “what do you mean “next level”? It clearly must be worse. Like, not even equal; but worse, xdxdxdxd”
But to me, the worst offender is not the hull. It’s the turret. 2A7’S TURRET IS WORSE THAN 2A5’S FOR SOME REASON!
2 Likes
xaxaxaxa^
yeah 2a7v use d-tech as its base armor, 122 still use c-tech
1 Like
Gaijin Designer : My favorite thing about Sweden is the best, yours is too bad, and the new one can’t be good, I said
Our game’s slogan “Restore History” looks very clown right now, because the game designers who like Sweden the most will ignore it, and Sweden is the best, and no one can get the same treatment as their favorite Sweden, even if they have the same specifications.
1 Like
Welp… that’s that, at least. But if there’s really no other ships, that means it’s gonna be an early premium… of course it would be. it was by far the most promising design of all the unique French MTBs… I’m smelling a tree full of copy pasted US and British motor boats.
Oh well. At least we have it, that’s better than nothing, I guess.
2 Likes
so when are we going to actually get a meanful update to dev
Any thoughts on further decompression in July balancing patch or so? For apex preds which was quite similar to the current one a decompression took place towards 12.0 and the same for air superiority onto 12.7. This may indicate another decompression towards 13.3 after the launch.
In that case ground vehicles would have to follow up towards 12.3 max as well, and for helicopters 12.3 max too. Even without said changes ground max br should see a decompression to BR 12.0 regardless.
Tristacomand back at it again with the persecution complex
2 Likes
2nd devblog
6 Likes
7 Likes
meem or me-me?
Bison and/or NF-5A pls
3 Likes
@Smin1080p If you are able is there any intention of adding the Mig-21-93 to the Soviet tech tree? As you know we waited for the Mig-21 Bison or equivalent for quite some time & I plan to purchase as well.
However, having a Mig-21 Bison without the R-77 seems rather pointless. If GJ could add this one & the tech tree Russian version w/R-77s I believe it would be a hit. The aircraft is nimble enough & definitely a 12.7 easy with R-77s in the Soviet tech tree.
BTW the Soviet tree has no fighters at 12.3 … It would fill in some this missing BRs nicely imo. Harriers & other Aim-120 carriers are found at this BR range with ability to carry more Aim-9Ms & Aim-120s. I do not see how a Russian Mig-21-93 would affect balance.
1 Like
I think this should be all the pre-orders except for the French coastal, UE-1, L2A4M, A-1A, BISON, and then the VCT-2.