Major Update "Seek & Destroy" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

VEXTRA 105 recieved massive fixes and became amazing, some minor fixes still waiting tho.

4 Likes

The RWR of the Pantom KWS LV has been fixed and the model number can now be displayed.The T80UE1 was strengthened, the vextra105 received thermal imaging, but the new shells were not ready, and there were serious problems with the rate of fire, 9.7s, which was much slower than the American 120mm, the slowest 105mm. The armor of the CV9035DK was refined. And then, now jets including the F16C SU27 Mirage2000 F15 Grepen are not able to use “helmet aiming for radar missiles”, which I suspect is a BUG

3 Likes

It’s RWR got fixed (so now its the same as the F-4F late) and it got its CCIP now. That’s it.

1 Like

F-15J(M) is the correct designation.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6htEt6yUsEsr

2 Likes

We all know only Russia could possibly have designed KE-defeating ERA/PRA

1 Like

Quite surprised how efficiently they roll out updates to clients.
They got a pretty functional dev team it seems.

Spoiler

IMG_4705

If this image is anything to go by, just two.

1 Like

Thanks. No 77’s listed. Still 2x R60, 2x R73 and 2x R27 would be quite an interesting load out on an attacker.

PBB-AE is R-77

1 Like

Gnat too for both of these countries. It seems Finland likes British trainers.

Updated smoke grenade models. Cool!

10 Likes

Hood now also.

1 Like

On a different note, Gaijin gave Leopard 2A7HU the Leopard 2A7V treatment.

Again, the 2024 tank has worse armor than the 1990s one. For… whatever reason.



10 Likes

still don’t understand why gaijin refuse to fix it, if not to it’s irl value at least make it the same as 122

1 Like

Exactly… as of now, Leopard 2A7V and Leopard 2A7HU literally have worse armor than the Swedish test Leopard 2A5 prototypes…

I mean look at the damn turret. It can’t even protect on a 60º arc. IT’S LITERALLY WORSE THAN THE INGAME LEOPARD 2A5 TURRET! Does that not make them question anything?!


4 Likes

If a gaijin deigns to read the Swedish documents from the tender, he will receive the following data:

Corresponds to Leo 2 (TVM-1 (max)) and Leo 2S (Strv 122A/B)

image

If this is accurate, basically, as of now:

-2A7V/HU have 30-100mm less on the turret
-122s have 30-100mm more on the turret
-122s have 100mm more on the hull

I can’t wrap my head around Gaijin’s logic that Strv 122’s armor is significantly better, while Leopard 2A7V/HU’s armor is worse. AT WORST, it should be the same, Jesus! The last gen 2024 tanks should not have worse armor than the 1990s one, let alone than THE 1990s PROTOTYPE!

3 Likes

thats 670mm KEP hull without addon armor right?

Also the A7HU still lacks the armor module on top of the turret, which is made of structural steel。。。。。 bruh
Guys come and see this …↗…↗…↗…↗…↗