Its the LAV-25 turret iirc, so definitely similar
honestly i am fine with losing the 9Ms if it means it drops to 11.7 and it no longer can face Su27SMs Mig29SMTs F15Cs F16Cs and Gripens
isnt the radar of the shar quite a bit better? Additionaly the J-8F only gets 2 fox 3, while you could take 4 or 2 9m, the 4 ir missles the j-8f has are the pl8. Would say the aim 9m are better as well
Holy mother of copy and paste
Eh… maybe. 9Ls are barely good enough at 10.3 for FRS1. I dont think I really want to be at 11.7 with only 9Ls for IRs. But Id live with 12.0 with 9Ms
Flight model is currently a place holder but yeah i would say the Shar 2 is better
while its missiles are better the performance of the J8F is just better and most fox3 carriers will just have better performance as on the dev apparently its currently the FM of the Gr7 so its gonna get even worse, and I would argue the performance of a jet is still one of the most important aspect, especially with no HMD you have to rely on that performance to get the missile to even lock.
I meant for Enduring Confrontation, SB, not RB.
Where does that idea come from ? It 's not in that video you keep linking, nor is it based on any forum moderator comments that I’ve been able to find.
If there 's no actual source for that rumour, it 's probably just hearsay like the imaginary " Panavia licensing difficulties " idea - not based in reality, and not useful for understanding what gaijin might plan to do in future.
its literally a Stormer hull with the Turret from the VCC-30/80 its why people are surprised we never got it when the italians got the VCC-30/80
Sorry, is the ability to chuck all-aspects at 9.3s not good enough for you?
I think the idea of such intensive military cooperation is great. And I think this should also be reflected in the game, in relation to the branches of the armed forces concerned, and comprehensively with insignia and corresponding vehicles for the army and navy
Looks weird and sounds like a good possible addition for the UK
the whole thing is 2 years old, the necesary sources are buried anywhere in the old forum. i am just telling you whats the known speculation is. If you believe this not to be the case thats all good as well.
Still fact is that is a plane 2 years in the making that was very finished
im pretty sure that was said on stream by mike and oxy
Forgetting about downtiers for a second. If it has Flares. It has to pop 1 flare and the 9L is defeated. Where something like the F-5C can rely upon flight performance to then bring guns to bear. the SHar really cant. Getting guns on target is really difficult. Especially with it missing radar gunsight.
Obviously vs a flareless target, 9Ls are good. But in the usual full uptiers I get or if we are talking about the FA2 being 11.7/12.0 with 9Ls. Then its hopeless. You stand even less chance bringing guns to bear and nothing is flareless
thats cool and all but we cant change they are going to France since they want to keep the BeNaLux together
Right? GJ decided to add the aircraft. They should model it as so.
Imagine the F-4EJ Kai was called the Improved F4EJ at release & still given its a old AN/APQ-120 radar of the F4E?
That is happening with this “improved Baz”.
I am fairly certain GJ intentionally kept the variant vague “Improved” to hide the fact it’s a copy paste & minimize a community focus. They know they cannot deny the HMD for it. There is substantial evidence that the HMD is a standard upgrade of this program as well as many items such as you listed & did not.
Regardless, this is no F-15C Baz Mashupar. It is not even a Baz.
it’s just a copy paste F-15C MIIP II that the American Tree received with the same underperforming engines.
They should at least give it the technology appropriate to its place in WT & BR. I will be content with the HMD & a fixed flight model that does not immediately shatter into pieces if you slightly roll while pitching. Also fix this weak thrust.
Let’s see what they decide to do.
Yea what Shini said is kinda true as people messed around with the unfinished model and made it flyable.
The Original model maker was not happy at all iirc.
To be fair the “F-15J Kai” is also not an official name, which might be a good example too
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6htEt6yUsEsr