Major Update "Seek & Destroy" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

they did this with both the Tornado F3 and the F3 “late”

the F3 they never told us what year it was meant to be but the radar was a type Z which was preproduction yet it had BOL pods it shouldn’t have.

and there is no such thing as the “late” so we dont know which upgrade programme it is, yet they called the F15C the MISP II

3 Likes

Why does this sound so much like a French name ? xD

3 Likes

@StormRyder13 you will realy not be happy, i just went trough the datamines and found this
image

10 Likes

The best guess with the “late” thing is that its not a specific variant. By stating its the CSP, AOP or FSP variant then it limits it to a specfic loadout. Just saying “late” means it could get further upgrades in the future like Aim-120C5s. Its kinda annoying, but makes sense (if they do actually give it the C5s)

I love my single tank getting special voice lines, but none of the like 5 Canadian vics have Canadian voice lines

1 Like

I doubt it they will just make it another variant with ASRAAM and C5s

Yeah its just a bit sad but on the Bright side some one will be happy with it

Yep. Already told the British server about that.

They get 1 vehicle and gets voice lines yet Canada has multiple for years as it have a big deal made out of our tank in a tree the doesn’t speak English and we don’t have voices lines.

The little things pile up.

2 Likes

oh yeah definitly, i dont mind either way, still bit sad it is

At which point, it should just get called the AOP

Well based on its load out that is the one it is

FSP will be next :)

1 Like

yeah but alas its gaijin and they dont wanna give us specifics for aircraft

they should give us WSU :3 I want my tornado with ERC90s and EJ200s

1 Like

Good thing I used the F-4EJ Kai as the example.

Interesting, I wonder why GJ gave this Japanese F-15 the Kai designation.

If it is made up by GJ, surely It was to make is seem more interesting that it is. Why else?

1 Like

Which is still accessible, and does not have anything to support that claim from what I’ve been able to find through my own research in it.

It came from issues the Ace Combat had in remaking some of their older titles, which made people think something similar could happen to WT.

( It hadn’t, btw. Gunjob had proven that time and time over. )

A claim which hasn’t any believable proof for it anywhere. If we can’t show that there was a reason to believe this earlier, there 's certainly no reason to believe it now.

1 Like

Nobody’s forgetting that.
And people would’ve thought less if it was just a tech tree vehicle but its not.
Its an event vehicle, where you gotta grind to get it.
Its in dev server, here take a look,

you can’t even hit target 160m+ away

The problem with that is very few aircraft below 10.0 have flares.

You know what else is hopeless? Being in a flareless jet vs all-aspect missiles. Which is pretty much every game above 9.0. Gaijin at least band-aid fixed it by making a bunch of 9.0/9.3s to 8.7/9.0

Sorry, but its better the Sea Harrier sucks than further inflame the problem of any flareless jet above 9.0 being food for all-aspect slingers.

So Sea Harrier FA2 should be DOA at 12.0 with Aim-9Ls because some 9.0 aircraft that it will never see dont have flares?

(personally I find the F-5Cs with cold fusion engines far more oppresive in my 9.3/9.7 aircraft than the A-10s slinging 9Ls)

2 Likes

Vroom vroom
image

3 Likes

I will put you in the tornado and you will like it :3

1 Like