Major Update "Seek & Destroy" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

while that is annoying it has better mobility hitting 75km/h in both forward and reverse

I think you, and him, both spelled it out pretty clearly. Doing it the way they are means they can just add a new F-15 whenever they want to give it a new weapon.

regarding my comment on the fake radar HMD of the Mig29 & Su27. Allow me to clarify.

Neither the Su27 nor the Mig29 (except SMT) can use the Opto-electronic pointing stations (OEPS)
for directional beam control of their radar dishes… They all use the same bootleg jury rigged Sapfir-23ML (Mig-23ML) Cassegrain radar dishes of late 60’s design & still analog (Soviet Union lacked industry to produce quality radars 1980s untill Zaslon radar in Mig-31)
The Radars found in both the Su27 & Mig29 (except SMT) are technologically incapable of using a HMD for radar targeting, the OEPS HMS was only capable of cooperating with the R-73 & R-27ET.

Planar array antennas are capable of directional beam control & HMD like found on the F-16C & SMT.

In case you did not know what kind of radar dish a Cassegrain antenna is… . It’s the same type found in the F-4E of Vietnam. That is an analog Cassegrain antenna just like the one found in the Su-27 & Mig29. They are not capable of directional beam control whatsoever. The radar HMD is made up & operates on nothing.
image

*The Su-27 & Mig-29 has always had an unfair, hyper unrealistic advantage over the competition I just did not want to say it, as I am a Soviet Main :)

10 Likes

damn it I was bamboozled by the “min-max: 6-12” part

if its anything like night mode, you get it in 1 in every 20 mathces

lmao what? can you dm it to me as well?

i mean, f4f ice complain is valid, besides that i would only complain about the f4f ice and a coastal not being a lot, ups forgot the premium 2a4 m can for a moment, still tech tree sth would be nice

I am happy for italy to get the 2a7hu, uk ifv isnt even close to puma or the needed top tier ifv, they need (same for france).
The Namer 30 will be a blessing for israel as well

5500

For me, 2x PL-5B & 6x PL-5B replace by PL-5C and add PL-8B on J-8F

I guess J-7G before J-8F and J-11F at early rank VIII and would be 12.0 BR (Air AB, Air RB & Air SB)

Heck of a lot better than the first warrior willl perform though (we hope)

F4F ICE needs some love

9L(i)
Better MAVs
Correct RWR
and many others

and then it should be all right

7 Likes

does it get HMD?

Desert Warrior gives me cheaped dardo vibes ngl

1 Like

not like that will be hard to do, but yeah the tows alone will be great for anti tank duties

jup thats the hope, they way we had the 9l(I) suggestion acknowledged is a joke… but hey it worked.

Maybe 12.3 with the tornado would be nice, but not necesary. On the other site the J-8F might do well with actualy going to 12.0 as well

1 Like

oh yeah no I get the F4F ICE complaints but at the same time I cant have sympathy for some of the people that told us when we were in the same boat “stop asking for the world”, I do hope it goes down in br and that we either get the DA typhoons soon or handicapped Trenche 1s

1 Like

thats a no

na thats the Stormer 30
image

3 Likes

its hard to decide because the J8F I would argue is still better then the Shar FA2 so I would say the Shar should be lower but that puts it at 11.7, which I know I wouldnt mind but some 10.7 players could get upset so if it does I would say lose the 9Ms

Yeah, either a load of stuff moves down or some nations are just going to have to grit their teeth for a few months

1 Like