i just realized they removed the skyflash on the gripen
Yeah, Centauro || would be nice, ajd for this update they could have done 2A7HU and that one Ariete with Centauro || turret.
I imagine it might end up being rolled out a bit slower than thought, due to some aircraft having more unique displays and whatnot.
Well, a good side news is that arietes do have a spall liner. Armor is yet to be fixed, but spall liners are a good start. Not calling names but honestly its time for VT4 and merkava mk4s to take the spot of worst top tier MBTs.
I am rather confident that the B2 will eventually come, mostly because its one of the two rank 7 lights with a BR of 11.3 while the CV90120 is at rank 8, which means something might be below it.
No it really isnt
Thats what the stream and the blogs are for.
The dev server is open so they can have a test run and receive bug reports before going live. That is the main reason for having a dev server. They also get to hype up the vehicles and all that, but the main purpose is ironing out bugs. And when you gate content behind a grindwall for no reason its irratating.
They could make the RP modifier x100 instead of x5 and solve the problem.
Yall don’t talk about the F-15C missing its BOL pods, 4 amraams and having the same radar that is on the A variant but with TWS?
2 Likes
This is an MANPAD on a ship. Different thing from the S-300 and MIM-Hawk that were made visible in the CDK today.
1 Like
i think your forgetting about my challengers?
So is Sweden really only getting 2 vehicles next update, one of which is (another) 10.0 premium light tank?
OK, then give a better option to the problem that is called ARB, because 16 v 16 doesn’t cut it.
its not worth the grind honestly, nothing new and useful, the F16C gets 6 amraams at 12.7 so why the F15C idk.
Centauro 2 won’t be much different compared to Centauro I 120 gameplay wise. It’s still a lightly armored wheeled vehicle within the meta of heavily armored MBTs.
Though I agree, Centauro 2 should’ve come in the previous update with the addition of the premium one ;)
2 Likes
oh sorry i think youve gotten my take a bit confused, i want smaller games. i will be switching to the 12 vs 12 format asap.
But for me, I want gajin change new targeting pod with 3rd gen thermal on pod & sight instead AN/AAQ-28 (V) Litening II for F-16C Block 50 in current dev server or next dev server
1 Like
I hope so, but I doubt they will add more or improve them. Still waiting for the ability to use Air to Ground weapons from the cockpit view by using the camera mfd screen to target ground units
In current modeling as, as it’s modeled to be a shot anywhere to remove it, even the plate which isnt part of mechanism is considered one, when in reality to disable carousel yiu would need to hit motor or memory core.
But even then crew has same backup controls for functioning the carousel which isnt hard.
The rammer is completely correct. Crew cant replace it as easy, it has to do it completely manually and thats where long manual reload time for T series come from.
So they chose to implement autoloaders incorrect, practically the worst way for vehicles having them.
Although 2S38 doesnt even have first ready rack now so if people really wanted it just because of 2S38 that backfired.
If human loaders got same treatment as current autoloaders it would mean modeling loader as whole square of his work space.
I know well the Israeli vehicles that can be added, I have recurring conversations with people from Israel, but they lack many options in terms of light vehicles, tank destroyers and anti-aircraft weapons in ranks 4 and 5, for example, in cases like that, Israel having a sub tree would be a solution to fill those spaces. The vehicles you described to me are of a high range.
Btw does OTOMATIC get internal model rework?
this is meant to be a nerf for autoloaders which have always been a bit too good for the lack of negatives they gave. doing this will now mean we can disable them which wasnt even possible before. although i think with some it should go to the manual loading (if it isnt already implemented that it).