This is the truest question, and it there will never be a justifed answer
Yeah, probably. I can see the French using it as a bit of a shotgun
Well, in War Thunder, average engagement ranges are on the 15km range anyway, so having longer range is not that much of an advantage as high close range performance is.
Itβs especially strange considering every nation (except subtrees) used either AIM-120B, R-77, or MICA-EM (only France). There was no reason to add a half-dozen ARH missiles all with different capabilities, many of which are nerfed to make them balanced against others.
That is what I anticipate. AAM-4s should be equal to C-3 to C-7 variants, before that Japan should use a placeholder.
I love the Japanese cruisers they have such cool floatplanes on them.
1 Like
Exactly, Gaijin is just making it more confusing on their end
ROCAF Mirage 2000-5EI as well.
Is that CV90 35mm identical pen to the Japanese ifv one?
Speaking of this: will MiG-29G get R-77?
MiG-29G is the only taste of Russian Bias I have, so I wonder if it will be complete with R-77 or not hahah
Aye, thatβs also gonna be a plus for them
So why does france get a F16 with aim9ms at 12.0 and china has their f16 with aim9ls at the same br?
hopefully its subject to change since its still in the dev server
1 Like
no, it shouldnβt even have R-27ER
4 Likes
no it cannot carry R-77 its the very first production version of the MiG-29
1 Like
It canβt carry R-77s and germany never used them
1 Like
Thats the Loop
Gaijin screws over Naval β People Complain β Nothing done about it β Less and less people play β People make fun of it β No one plays β Gaijin thinks people dont like Ships β Neglects Naval even further β and Repeat
7 Likes
dw Tornafo F.3 with AMRAAMS still have 9Ls
And itβs proper A2G ordnance is still missing. Yeahβ¦
afaik, historically 29Gβs never used R-77βs
I dont think they even converted to Aim-120βs in their life service
nope it gets 9M too