Major Update "Ninth Wave" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

It’s actually just the F-16C P since the rest of PoBIT is missing.

3 Likes

2 way datalink would allow fire control and midcourse corrections via other friendly jets and awacs (not in game).

This would be way too op for now, and multiple other missiles have this capability, hence it’s pretty useless in game now

i would rather them not add shit than add something with the wrong capabilities

Lol, good luck waiting, I’m still waiting for the Gripen A to get it’s actual hud same with the E, all of its placeholder slop.


God it is so unfortunate we don’t have this beauty

1 Like

im not asking for all that Just for the missile to be able to reconnect to the launching aircraft

mfds look much nicer

question, since i havent been paying atention, do we have a eta on the dev server?

monday

1 Like

tbf its another day in the office at WTs vehicle representation

1 Like

1 way dl allows that too

Plus by the time a missile is notched in game it usually overshots/ is out of energy

Dev server is on monday this time? I wonder what sort of vehicle or feature they plan on jump scaring us with now…

wow woke up saw new dev blog and its made me realise I think gaijin employees are just lazy at this point lol 90% sure Smin spends more time a day babysitting us all, then the entire dev team spend daily fixing or adding things to the game

Gaijin should open the game to mods. i bet random people can do better at modeling aircraft than them

Gripen Demo is a prototype testbed version of the JAS39D, so no, the E isn’t the gripen Demo.
What is currently in-game is JAS39E early serries production used for certifications and safety tests (like integrating new weapons/software/etc).

Yeah especially when we just have the basic radar and RWR overlay rather than the swedish one
image
God this looks pathetic but go figure they’ve ignored the A

Did we come to a agreement for the name then with the E outside of SAAB test production model? It’s not a Gripen E but it’s also not a Gripen E early as it’s older than the actual production model Gripen E

Imo it should just be called SAAB 396002

Not sure what you are refering to here?

if you’ve every had to notch the R27er you know how much harder to notch reconnecting datalink makes a missile couple that with 0 INS drift and you get some insane lethality, all they have to do is change that stat from NO to YES in the stats and i would consider it a worth while upgrade over the C-5

They really had to reach hard to hype this F-16 up with those bulletpoints lmao.

3 Likes

Given it’s not a Gripen E especially given it’s not even the model in service with the Flygvapnet did we come to an agreement to call it cause Gripen E is technically wrong.