i personally think it will be cool asf drving around in my abrams and destroying infantry and the other way around.
can someone here use the new ammo stands? they arent showing up for me. also the mig-25 isnt showing
Not really, the Jaguar has a role closer to a light tank IRL, so classifying it as a light tank works, since it’s a scouting vehicle
Classifying it as a tank destroyer would also work, though, but its primary purpose is scouting, as opposed to the BMPT’s primary purpose of being a nightmare to infantry
Its hidden.
both features?
we getting rare experimental Freccias but not Centauro II … like, why?
why can all the youtubers use it but not me wtf
as nice as you want but we would also like something for the TT
Because you’re not a content creator so you don’t get the content creator pack with all the stuff on the dev server
It does look a little interesting although possibly DOA if given the standard AIM-120 + AIM-9M combo. It’s time for the python 4.
MiG-25PD
nah I meant it was valid to discuss
but anyways I later updated the gif comment with the “scout vehicle” logic as well

The H-75M is back in the files after a long time spent removed, it looks like it 's going to become the first fixed-undercarriage Hawk to be playable.
I made a small report on it, if they ask for more i can dig for it.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Ko8Dc7BAuYRJ
The point of only having two AAMs warranting a lower BR would be valid, if the Buc S2B didn’t also sit at 10.7, but I guess this is gonna be one of those rare cases where they decided that a rather small difference deserves a different BR
It’s just a shame that that BR balancing approach is apparently almost never used
For GRB the 209 definitely should have a higher BR though since AGM-65Gs are infinitely more useful than 65Bs
when a planes main focus isnt air combat it really shouldnt be a balancing factor but a little bonus.
its just unfair and bad balance
Have TT version it as well?
Not a high degree of comradeship used in the distribution of spall liners between the BMPTs!
Quite spectacular the difference in modelling, for example the BMPT have a magazine for the 30mm while the -72 have singular ammunition modelled…
Good thing they’ve implemented seperate BRs for ground and air battles…
Oh wait, they still haven’t made use of that feature to make planes at and below 10.0 meet less all aspect missiles.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Od7vUraSmBxM
I’ve created a bug report for the AJAX’s weight being too high, please “I have this issue” if you would like the AJAX to be less fat :)


