If there are some sources showing R-13 is compatable with the MIG-29, then a suggestion report can be made.
I wouldn’t take that as a positive ecample, the Thai F-16 is just a weird mix of 4 different variants and a typo right now.
The HMD for example is used on the F-16B OCU two-seater (DASH) and the F-16A/B eMLU (JHMCS), neither of which are in game.
3 Likes
The better argument might be that the Rafale F3 only got HMD because it trialed HMD. It never used it operationally until the F4.
If the F-2 trialled it. Then in both the case of Rafale, and probably many other examples. Should qualify for the F-2 to get HMD.
There bare minimum requirement from what I understand is that there is documented evidence of “X” piece of equippment actually being used on an actual aircraft
10 Likes
They just get ignored anyway. R73 is compatible but… balance reasons. Why do you think people are going to waste time finding sources when you just deny them.
Operational use has not been a requirement for consideration.
If being the current question and reason why its not received it.
2 Likes
This is not the case. R-73 has not been added on the 9.12 due to its BR.
The request for R-13 has nothing to do with a BR issue and a suggestion can be submitted if its compatable and sources can show that. The developers will then decide.
1 Like
Im fairly certain there is ample evidence of it, but will leave that too the Japanese mains.
But so far its sounds more like its been denied on balance grounds rather than a lack of evidence.
but a missile has been added to it which it historically never had
but the missile it historically had gets denied for balancing reasons
2 Likes
They’ve arrived for a month, give them a minute to rest.
I have quite literally just explained the opposite.
If there is sufficient evidence, it can be reported. It is not being withheld for balance. Simply there is a lack of clear information.
@Smin1080p_WT Do you know if there’s any plans to increase the squadron RP cap from 20k? With the current cap it takes around 3 months to research mid-higher tier squadron vehicles which is an absurd amount of time for just 1 vehicle. (Unless ofcourse you open your wallet and pay premium prices for non-premium vehicles).
3 Likes
why should china get the Abrams in WT
at this point just give everyone a Leo2, T-90 and Abrams
Cause it is Chinese?
Germany gets a T-72, why? Cause it’s German.
then move it to 13.0?
first of all:
no it is not
second of all:
china already has top tier tanks
third of all:
what purpose would an abrams in the chinese tech tree fulfill?
is there a gap to fill?
it was in actual service with east germany
2 Likes
And the Chinese tree is the home for both PRC and ROC vehicles.
5 Likes
the M1 Abrams is an American main battle tank. Its named after a US general. the T-72 is a Soviet main battle tank.
At the moment, not anything to announce.
sure lets rob just every tech trees uniqueness by giving everyone everything
1 Like