Im fairly certain there is ample evidence of it, but will leave that too the Japanese mains.
But so far its sounds more like its been denied on balance grounds rather than a lack of evidence.
Im fairly certain there is ample evidence of it, but will leave that too the Japanese mains.
But so far its sounds more like its been denied on balance grounds rather than a lack of evidence.
but a missile has been added to it which it historically never had
but the missile it historically had gets denied for balancing reasons
They’ve arrived for a month, give them a minute to rest.
I have quite literally just explained the opposite.
If there is sufficient evidence, it can be reported. It is not being withheld for balance. Simply there is a lack of clear information.
@Smin1080p_WT Do you know if there’s any plans to increase the squadron RP cap from 20k? With the current cap it takes around 3 months to research mid-higher tier squadron vehicles which is an absurd amount of time for just 1 vehicle. (Unless ofcourse you open your wallet and pay premium prices for non-premium vehicles).
why should china get the Abrams in WT
at this point just give everyone a Leo2, T-90 and Abrams
Cause it is Chinese?
Germany gets a T-72, why? Cause it’s German.
then move it to 13.0?
first of all:
no it is not
second of all:
china already has top tier tanks
third of all:
what purpose would an abrams in the chinese tech tree fulfill?
is there a gap to fill?
it was in actual service with east germany
And the Chinese tree is the home for both PRC and ROC vehicles.
the M1 Abrams is an American main battle tank. Its named after a US general. the T-72 is a Soviet main battle tank.
At the moment, not anything to announce.
sure lets rob just every tech trees uniqueness by giving everyone everything
It is actually in service in ROC army.
That is not a reason for not adding a tank, and never has been.
Neither has that been one.
T-72 was in East German service, thus why it was added.
ROC has Abrams T named ‘T’ for ‘Taiwan’.
Exactly.
It’s home to the ROC/Taiwan, so it’s perfectly fair to for their stuff, after all anyone who asks for them likely wants to make a line-up based around the nation.
Especially something like an MBT, which bar the thematic lineup I don’t think is exactly needed. However I support it’s additions due to point one.
you said:
and last time i checked
Taiwan =/= China
yes it has for sub tree additions
example being UK not getting the Rafale or Su-30
or Indian tanks
yes it is,
it was stated multiple times by @Smin1080p_WT before
Taiwan = Republic of China.
It also a bit hard to call them a sub tree when they make up the majority of the early tree.
Last time I checked “Republic of China” is a de-factor government of the Island of Taiwan and still maintains the claim for all of China (which includes the mainland, the island and some extras)
well yeah this is because PRC did not officially exist until 1949. they should have just full switched to PRC instead of keeping RoC