will mig 29 9.12/9.13 ever get R73 and remove R27er R60s are unusable will it ever get them as it could go to 13.0 or even remain same BR as Su33 at 13.0 gets 6 R73 and R27ER
12.3 F/A-18A hornet has better missles on a very similar FM aim7m is a bit worse than ER but mig29 a radar is fooled easily so it does matter and IR wise he has AIM-9L which GAPS the R60MK by miles
2 Likes
It seems that this version doesn’t have any new mechanics that attract me. See u guys in September.
Imagine if the players would have voted for Yes on the Camo nets back then…
would be pretty usefull for SAMs
6 Likes
I hope they can just use QN201DD or akd10 IR version as the temporary substitutes, but seems Gaijin just wish Z10 is a ****
The Expanded Chaff Adapter + AIM-54 next to it maybe; can’t think of much else that would fit since BOL uses an existing graphic. But it probably shouldn’t be available to the Ali-Cat (R.I.P)
2 Likes
This would incur a change of BR, which is not planned.
As always, its not just a case of a vehicle automatically getting everything possible.
4 Likes
They could just add the Tv one which will be 8-9 if too OP, or a 12km SAL. Also IdK what lead them to thinking it was LOAL.
Where is the Helmet mounted display for the F2 ? I miss the HMD for the F2 where is it ? Also where is the rest of the weapon loadout from the F2 ?
Do you have any evidence that suggests it had an HMD in real life?
Rafale.
Sentence.
4 Likes
It was applied to a test variant where previously Gaijin accepted certain tested features to be applied in game.
why not?
Bruh, imagine going to ENG forum to complain and brigade a suggestion on RU forum
1 Like
voted “for”. thanks.
1 Like
What did it say?
question, since the YAK-141 was well documented and we know they would have tried to fit the radar and IRST at the same time, can the same argument be made for the Streetfighter 2 and its brimstones as if it was fully realised it would have had the twin launcher
it would also fit 2 roles the UK doesnt have, ATGM armed MBT and a vic with FnF ATGMs or at the very least top attack ATGMs
2 Likes
Gaijin did say they would on their YouTube channel shortly after it was released, what happened to that?
Please do not encourage others on the forum to vote no on a vote (let alone one that isnt in this forum) for a vehicle that you do not want
Tanks and aircraft (as well as ships) have differing requirements.
In the case of streetfighter, the entire launcher was a non functional mockup. So the tank is not planned. Other ATGM carriers are possible.
I don’t know what its referring too. Entirely possible perhaps it was discussed with the video team at one stage. But its not planned now.