So if some are different enough to add, what about the ones that aren’t, but are in the game anyways?
Well none of those F-15’s are in game, every one is pretty different than the one before or after it
India is the same…
india has a single unique plane in game even its premiums and event stuff is just C&P
2 Likes
And that should have been TT instead of Unobtainium.
If only there were a better way for sub-trees to be added… ;)
Dev server update; still no F-106
Put the patch back in the oven until the Dart is golden brown and cooked all the way through, please and thank you.
4 Likes
You could argue that the Mig21 bison is unique
The airframe itself might not, but the whole package is
Just asking, are there plans to increase or differ rewards for munitions eliminated?
Also how does it work if I launched 1 but got missiles intercepted twice?
Right, now what about other situations?
Yak-141, while a unique vehicle, is still incomplete and added to a nation with many options for the BR.
Similarly the F-16AJ, which was never built in the first place, was an exception added instead of another nations very real F-16, something that would’ve been equal to the F-111K situation.
I understand how it’s done now, but there’s a subjective judgement involved that makes it unpredictable. For example one person might argue that, while the Kranvagn was incomplete, and the Tiger II in the tree fills a similar role, this Tiger II isn’t close enough, so instead the Kranvagn should be added. Another then might argue that the Tiger II is close enough, so it shouldn’t be added. And another person again might argue that no matter how the Tiger II relates, it is not placed in the research tree, meaning no matter what the capability from the tree is missing and needs to be added.
Just generally, at what point are vehicles too similar to be added alongside eachother?
It’s this bit of subjective input that I think is not entirely fair, which is why I’d want to see a more clear and objective system. I am not saying the current one is inherently wrong, it is working for them right now, but I have my reasons to dislike it.
eh its still at the end of the day a mig 21 still gonna fly like one
Fair if you see it that way
But imo it is unique just like the Iranian Tomcat
A plane at higher tiers instead just defined by its flight model but also by its sensors and armament
1 Like
If I can’t identify and read DNA sequences with it than it’s modeled wrong.
2 Likes
if i cant weld tank hatches shut with the laser its modeled wrong
Someone please tell me they have added BOL to American fighters and my cries have been finally answered.
And them getting the sniper pod!
no it hasnt happened for either thing
Bro, i’m going back to my big report spot and rot away to make one.
A very iconic domestic vehicle that was the only one of its type until F-35 (Afterburning / Supersonic VTOL carrier aircraft). There is no equivalent of this.
At there time there were no “other nations” inside Japan. So no other options were on the table.
1 Like
I don’t know if I’ve asked this or not but is there a limit to how many subs a nation can get ?
1 Like
According to some secret sources (my mind) the dev server will close and reopen for a third time, this time bring an extra, and new vehicle to each nation (and vehicle trees) that isn’t necessarily something they need, but instead dual purpose (need/want).