Yeah that’s true, some maps are going to be very problematic.
On the other hand though, some guy setting up his launchers in some woodland is going to be really difficult to counter.
What I really like about these multi vehicle systems, is that it’s going to encourage people to actually first spawn AA, so they have time to properly set up before the CAS is up (as opposed to getting trapped in spawn later).
It’s going to be very interesting though when the nations with multi vehicle systems are all on one team, lots of them first spawn, and the team just gets rolled because the other side all out numbered their MBT’s massively lol. People are really going to have to start paying attention to the scoreboard to pick when they should / shouldn’t first spawn them.
1 Like
Irrelevant as Canada isn’t a sub or independent and you want to claim them as your own anyway so again pointless.
As for NATO who is in charge of yes the US that’s why they spend the most and this is how they exploit other members, they threaten counties who make their own aircraft the Saudis almost brought the Mirage 4000 but you came in and under cut the French by making a better offer.
2 Likes
I feel like these guys you see on YT who use things like BMD4 as indirect artillery are going to have a field day against these launchers lmao.
Scenes when Sturmtiger + Recon UAV unironically become a viable form of SEAD xD
2 Likes
Just using them as an example of US spending for disproportionate benefit to the other.
That’s not undercutting, that’s called making the better offer. You said it yourself
and intern it’s another nation using a US aircraft and you complain about the US loosing it’s “Uniqueness”, so if you want the US to be more unique then stop under cutting other nations
5 Likes
Didn’t the M4K stop after Saudis bought Tornadoes anyways?
No, the Saudi’s were testing the M4K at the time you made your sudden offer. Why bring up the Tornado’s it was an aircraft were looking at buying and it’s not in the same situation as the M4K & the F-15
Because that’s what the Saudis were also considering buying (and ended up buying, putting a stop to M4K)
1 Like
The US is literally still working on undercutting other countries, they’re trying very hard to derail the GCAP right now. (Trying to get both the Saudis and Japan to buy the F-47, which would completely ruin the project). The F-2 itself was literally a result of the US undercutting japanese domestic efforts to create their own jet.
12 Likes
It’s pretty funny. Gaijin themselves admitted in the 2024 FAQ that they screwed up the balance. But for some players, I guess the “balance” is the version of GRB where CAS dominates.
I dunno, I just play arcade lol
1 Like
Literally what we’ve been saying, on top of this even if Canada makes it’s own aircraft the US would still try and claim it like the skink
2 Likes
Same story for the Lavi :/
1 Like
What we could’ve had if not for US sabotage…
12 Likes
And the Arrow for the Canadians too
5 Likes
Saudis buying F-15 wasn’t undercutting it was buying a more proven and capable jet
3 Likes
CF-100 and 105 should go to UK. Domestic Canadian and British Canadian stuff belongs in UK.
1 Like
So was the M4K which my I add the Saudis were testing at the same time as your offer
Any news about dev stream? I assume its tomorrow morning as usual unless stated otherwise.
Because you under cut the Saudi’s at the time of testing so you proven my point about the M4K being under cut again
1 Like
