It’s 11 years lol
1st flight is a more favorable statistic for time flying
Not to mention M4K was never even introduced so I cant put an introduction date because there isn’t one
So again that proven my point earlier that you tried to bring up with the Tornado while speaking about the M4K so that whole piece of that argument just been made invalid
1 Like
You wanted to talk about F-15 vs M4K but now bringing in Tornado after I started talking about F-15? Are you ok bc you really aren’t making sense
No one undercut anyone because the US initially committed to Saudi F-15 deal in 1977 2 years before M4K got off the ground
Yeah my bad, wiki said M4K was given up on bc of Tornado and not F-15 (this is true though)
At least you owned up,
as for this part
“Historical records indicate significant interest from Saudi Arabia in the Mirage 4000, particularly in the late 1970s and early 1980s. For instance, Dassault Aviation notes that “The king of Saudi Arabia and the Shah of Iran were interested in the Mirage 4000 program even before its first flight.” This interest was driven by regional security needs and U.S. restrictions on F-15 sales, as mentioned in GlobalSecurity.org, which suggests conversations with Saudis left the impression they might acquire 100 Mirage 4000s.”
2 Likes
Canadians on their way to waste a bunch of money on a mid jet with no interested export nations
2 Likes
Crazy how well Japan mains are eating this update.
Literally getting their endgame ship, plane and AA all in one update.
Oh man, stoked for multi-vehicle platforms. This opens the door to so many opportunities. Couldn’t get a good shot from the trailer of the Type 81C’s system.
8 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Actually possible to suggest Iron Dome batteries now.
Would be so funny just deleting every AGM in the sky lmao.
1 Like
Welcome to part 3
This part gaijin announced devblog Mitsubishi F-2, battleship from Japanese navy & USN and japanese SAM toptier
And gaijin official post dev steam
Continuing the discussion from Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2):
Continuing the discussion from Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 2):
Finally !
i hope and i was thinking of sum like
yk how they say datalink?
well u can switch minimap to radar map while using a tank(not spaa) and when u first spawn the radar vehicle u can move it and then u spawn in ur tank(w extra sp ofc) so when either u died in ur tank or J out u can then spawn the main launcher and fire
basically u have radar, on ur tank, when u die u spawn in spaa OR another tank to wait for CAS
Fun fact: nations were looking at this and could have had some export success.
The UK wanted it as a stopgap for one of their own vehicles, and the French wanted the engine to make a bomber. Between rumours and White papers, this didn’t happen.
I’m not going to lie mate, I’ve read this about 6 or 7 times and I have legitimately no idea how to unpack or comprehend this lol
1 Like
xddd
basically
spawn 1: spawn in radar vehicle
then pop up options spawn in the launcher vehicle or choose to spawn in tank instead(which cost SP but less, say the entire spaa pack is 100sp, then second spawn should be 200sp, but discounted to 150sp)
spawn 2: tank, but now u can switch the top right minimap from minimap → radar map(which is the radar map, duh)
now if u die in tank, choose to spawn in launcher wont cost any sp, but spawn in another tank will cost full sp
2 Likes
Spawn radar vehicle first, put into position, then continue on to play the other vehicles by swapping for some SP until you want to spawn in the launcher, by which point the radar is conveniently already set up
2 Likes
yes
lord i cant get a single “make sense” sentence out of my mouth lmao
2 Likes