Major Update “Hornet's Sting” — DEV Server Changelog (10.03.2025)

Them buffing the rafale from a YouTube video lol

True af

Yet the EFT performs worse than its prototype that its stated to perform better than lol

The Rafale’s recent top speed buff on the dev? The report has two published book secondary sources and a 3rd brochure source.

It’s currently faster than eft in acceleration

From cited sources

That’s fine no issues with them buffing planes from sources.

However they need to stop playing favorites.

The EFT under performs and there are reports on that but no fix

The Harriers underperform massively no fix

But for rafale and su Russian jets they are fixed in the next patch

You can’t exactly call it “buffing the rafale from a YouTube video” then

@Fluffy_Bucketles

Yeah Mirage 2000C, Mirage 2000-5F, and Rafale should have radar-NCTR like what Su-30SM has, but this type of NCTR has some downsides. The Eurofighter and Rafale however should have more accurate NCTR due to sensor fusion combining RWR identification from the same location that the radar pings a target, and combining both data/information to readily obtain that same identification. (Sensor fusion + Radar NCTR)

However, other radars should not be able to identify or classify the Rafale due to its stealth properties. Eurofighter likely might be able to identify the Rafale due to sensor fusion, same for F-35, but otherwise the Rafale should be unidentifiable.

2 Likes

They buffed turn rate with a video

From the datamines, they’re already starting to lay down the framework for NCTR for planes like the Typhoons.

1 Like

there a suggestion for irst thats been waiting days for F14B tomcat and other planes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pgZfk4401w1V

not to mention TCS

Spoiler

image

1 Like

As someone else stated, it was video PLUS documentation materials. So it wasn’t video alone. At that point video is just extra evidence rather than required evidence.

If you provide all the required evidence, and then add some shoddy third party websites, the report will still get looked at because the required evidence meets the threshold, not because of some shoddy third party website. Just to give an example.

5 Likes

Hello! @Smin1080p_WT.

Any updates on the smokeless engine for the AASM hammers? Community Bug Reporting System

Regards

1 Like

The turnrate report has attached secondary source documents

This would be incorrect. The Rafale report also had:

  • Dassault Aviation, Rafale Marketing Brochure
  • Dassault Aviation, Snecma, Thales - Rafale International Issue #10
  • Aermacchi STR chart
14 Likes

Ok and then there is EFT and the Harriers among others. EFT and especially the Harriers all have direct sources as well.

My apologies about the Rafael I was misinformed

So why do some planes get immediate changes and others require years and months of waiting and arguing

EFT and Harrier in particular have multiple conflicting sources. Rafale did not.

4 Likes

Multiple conflicting sources for the Harrier you say?

There are barely any sources that have been found so that’s just not true.

For VIFF and turn performance there is only 1 source for the harrier 1.

They then buffed the harrier but did not manage to buff it to the source provided.

1 Like

Just a shame that the EFT seems to have gotten very little in the way of radar development this major update. Like no Priority track or GMTI

2 Likes