It’s currently faster than eft in acceleration
From cited sources
That’s fine no issues with them buffing planes from sources.
However they need to stop playing favorites.
The EFT under performs and there are reports on that but no fix
The Harriers underperform massively no fix
But for rafale and su Russian jets they are fixed in the next patch
You can’t exactly call it “buffing the rafale from a YouTube video” then
Yeah Mirage 2000C, Mirage 2000-5F, and Rafale should have radar-NCTR like what Su-30SM has, but this type of NCTR has some downsides. The Eurofighter and Rafale however should have more accurate NCTR due to sensor fusion combining RWR identification from the same location that the radar pings a target, and combining both data/information to readily obtain that same identification. (Sensor fusion + Radar NCTR)
However, other radars should not be able to identify or classify the Rafale due to its stealth properties. Eurofighter likely might be able to identify the Rafale due to sensor fusion, same for F-35, but otherwise the Rafale should be unidentifiable.
2 Likes
They buffed turn rate with a video
From the datamines, they’re already starting to lay down the framework for NCTR for planes like the Typhoons.
1 Like
there a suggestion for irst thats been waiting days for F14B tomcat and other planes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/pgZfk4401w1V
not to mention TCS
Spoiler
1 Like
As someone else stated, it was video PLUS documentation materials. So it wasn’t video alone. At that point video is just extra evidence rather than required evidence.
If you provide all the required evidence, and then add some shoddy third party websites, the report will still get looked at because the required evidence meets the threshold, not because of some shoddy third party website. Just to give an example.
5 Likes
Hello! @Smin1080p_WT.
Any updates on the smokeless engine for the AASM hammers? Community Bug Reporting System
Regards
1 Like
The turnrate report has attached secondary source documents
This would be incorrect. The Rafale report also had:
- Dassault Aviation, Rafale Marketing Brochure
- Dassault Aviation, Snecma, Thales - Rafale International Issue #10
- Aermacchi STR chart
15 Likes
Ok and then there is EFT and the Harriers among others. EFT and especially the Harriers all have direct sources as well.
My apologies about the Rafael I was misinformed
So why do some planes get immediate changes and others require years and months of waiting and arguing
EFT and Harrier in particular have multiple conflicting sources. Rafale did not.
4 Likes
Multiple conflicting sources for the Harrier you say?
There are barely any sources that have been found so that’s just not true.
For VIFF and turn performance there is only 1 source for the harrier 1.
They then buffed the harrier but did not manage to buff it to the source provided.
1 Like
Just a shame that the EFT seems to have gotten very little in the way of radar development this major update. Like no Priority track or GMTI
2 Likes
As he said they are mainly focused on new planes this update (buffs rafale vigorously)
Its a shame that didnt apply to it last major update when it was added
1 Like
The focus for EFT was addressing the many reports on the radar, which has several key improvements and upgrades this major.
Priority track doesn’t exist for any radar yet, not just EFT. GMTI remains to be added for many aircraft.
1 Like
Which, based upon what i’ve seen so far on the dev server. has yet to be implemented. TWS can barely locate and track the Mig-15s orbiting in the test flight.
Priority Track could be implemented using the same code being refined for the AESA radars and would function much the same. So it does exist on multiple radars such as the Su–34, Rafale and Kfir C10
Yes, GMTI remains to be added but the assumption for why it was removed was because of an overhaul needed for how GMTI is modeled/implemented, the fact the Su-30 is being added with it suggests that any issues delaying it being re-added (it was available on the dev server for both the Typhoon and Rafale) should have now been addressed and it could and should be re-added.
2 Likes