2 Likes
if you can show me other country F-35 launching them sure
If you can show us any other country actually using them in active service and not testing them sure
2 Likes
us brits dont want that half baked trash. we have a better missiles that he’s claiming is his
I’m sure many intelligent conversations were had above this statement. However just for the sake of things I pose a good question. With the Finnish hornet not getting JHMCS or the MLU-2 version is there a high chance that the CF-188 IMP I comes along with a pre-IMP and IMP II? Furthermore should they be given “naval aircraft” status? Also what’s a good placement for them? As a premium to replace the F-4J(UK) or a squadron or before/after the FA.2?
4 Likes
THIS IS THE POINT WE MEAN show us a Yankee plane firing ASRAAM
here you go
And that is a… test, show us an in service one carrying it
Well he’s got you there.
irrelevant to addition
1 Like
If its irrelevant who made the missile, i dont think it was America, so bye bye argument
ok, lets remove amraam from every non-US jet
and AIM-9s
Ok I’m in !
I second this. British missiles will sweep the floor of every nation.
2 Likes
Hey nice knockoff l7xyou have on those abrams and m60s, sure would be a shame
we make the M68 guns though. and the M256 does differ from standard L/44
We made the tank concept as a whole so there
1 Like
Yeah which was derived from the L7. It’s just got a shorter breech preventing it from using large propellant sizes
2 Likes
we made wright flyer so there
M68 is still an l7, sorry, but if you’re gonna be that picky about it it applies too
1 Like