LJDAM is currently under review. There is a suggestion for AGM-84E already up, but its not planned for this major for sure. That will depend on further review.
As of right now, there are no current plans for AGM-154A soon.
3 Likes
Ah fair enough.
I mean we wasn’t the one who brought up the SPAA’s, we were saying as a overall and future thing from everyone prescriptive not just Britain’s.
so Russian tor soon the then ?? no more 10.7 to 12.7 BR jump
BUT WWen after another modern patch of jets gets to destroy ground for months if not a year. I want them to give us a better answer then we understandi RELEASE JET AFTER JET may of messed up the meta. And we are testing or WORKING on something like when
So again, when sweden has a CAS gap ypu proceed to ignore it but then with other nations that aren’t lacking you bend the rules? Why do we constantly have to deal with 400k rp sinks for 1 modification change where as basically everyone else doesn’t? Why are the AJ37 and AJS37 not foldered? Should we expect the F18 to be added way later when its already dead on arrival should we expect another 400k sink without foldering?
Again its like you guys purposely do these things so i can’t actually trust you guys which sucks but i would like a serious answer.
1 Like
I’m pretty sure 2S6 is 11.0 and Pantsir is 12.0. Smaller gap than that, but something the Tor would definitely help with for sure.
1 Like
I know I was the one who made the bug report and suggestion. Hopefully it will be seen soon as it gives the Americans something more akin to the Kh-38MT. What about Harpoons though? Is it possible to see those this update?
1 Like
This ship is HMS Royal Sovereign later in life. Its the same ship, not a different ship.
This is a tad overexaggerated when in the same update HMS Rodney came, closely followed by HMS Warspite. Lets please keep things constructive here and not get off the rails too much.
A huge problem exists in meta made worse by including more and more advance jets. This canned answer we Know we messed up but we are working on it but we cant give you a actually time frame to expect us to fix this issue
Is this planned for all US aircraft that can use it (F-15E, F-16C, AV-8B+, A-10C) or just the hornet?
Also, do you guys plan to give EGBU to US? Iirc, we did use them, and they are also apparently compatible with F-117.
As always, thanks for all you say/do
2 Likes
Players have begged for a Rapier for years at this point, I know you’re only being told to say this as you’re the PR guy (I feel bad for you taking the brunt of annoyed players endlessly I hope they pay good) but getting it this late into the games existence and at a BR where its fullest lineups are flooded with other recent SPAA additions doesn’t seem like good execution.
we had one yes, but what about 2nd breakfast rapier xD
Sorry got a chance at a LotR reference, had to take it. These chaps need to calm on Indian sam stuff lol.
2 Likes
Also @Smin1080p_WT
Why continue to ignore this? Its cleary a huge problem yet when asked its almost always ignored.
1 Like
You would like an answer, but you don’t trust what has been said? That’s a bit of a strange combination.
Is there a plan to remove top tier air at least from ground rb until Heavy sams are put in game ? Because we are testing or working on something doesnt inspire great confidence its this update or even the next 2.
I have just answered you on this and you have not been ignored. Please do not spam.
A later MLU with A2G is planned. The current version did not have it.
2 Likes
That’s just a silly question. Of course not.
Oh a second Finnish Hornet, hmmmm
1 Like
Cmon, he straight up confirmed you guys are getting a later one in the future
Again why does the Finnish Hornet not get the same treatment as other nations when it is arguably the 2nd worst nation for CAS at top tier and the worst nation overall for CAS.