As we have already explained, because the A2G MLU package was part of a later modernisation that is planned to come as a sperate vehicle. The current version did not have any capacity for it.
As it has both does this mean we will see the difference between the 2 models? If not there is pretty much no difference in game.
Also will we see other CAS weaponry for the F/A-18Cs like the LJDAM, AGM-84E, AGM-154A, or anything of the sorts? Along with this is it possible for us to see anti-ship missiles like the Harpoon? It would be a fun addition in air sim for the F/A-18C.
1 Like
Its never been said it was “full” and nothing else can come there. Simply it was not the highest priority part of the tree (EG don’t expect a swarm of additions there anytime soon).
Two very different things.
Not at all. As evident literally in this major with Tracked Rapier.
The vague we understand we made a problem with the meta and we will “soon” fix or its in testiing doesnt mean anything. Can we get a more concrete answer of what we hope to give ground the ability to protect itself and PLAY AS GROUND IN GROUND RB ?
Ok a polite “bog off” if you will, a rule which is specific to naval only and is very unusual for gaijin as it means they cant copy paste something into another tree
Strange spelling of HMS Royal Sovereign, but I’m not familiar with russian alphabet. May be the same ship from a different period of history but its a different name.
Spoiler
Would be more historically accurate too as the soviets left it in a state so bad it was incapable of firing so had to be scrapped
Its a slap in the face for brit mains that an undoubtedly British ship was brought to the game and intentionally locked away from playing it under its righteous flag.
1 Like
Are there any plans to add lofting to the Aim-7P which it still lacks (last I checked)? Also does it have Datalink yet, I’ve heard it still doesn’t…
Having a new sparrow that’s a copy of the Aim-7M, which in it of itself is a copy of the AIM-7F wouldn’t be a very interesting or useful addition…
2 Likes
Hopefully we will see the expansion of hardkill APS and the long range SAMs they have brought up
I mean, I was referring more to those who want to see the tech form the sub-tree they enjoy, who the quote effects more.
But even then, they are grounded worries. As you have said, X couldn’t come because the Y area of a TT was full before.
LJDAM is currently under review. There is a suggestion for AGM-84E already up, but its not planned for this major for sure. That will depend on further review.
As of right now, there are no current plans for AGM-154A soon.
3 Likes
Ah fair enough.
I mean we wasn’t the one who brought up the SPAA’s, we were saying as a overall and future thing from everyone prescriptive not just Britain’s.
so Russian tor soon the then ?? no more 10.7 to 12.7 BR jump
BUT WWen after another modern patch of jets gets to destroy ground for months if not a year. I want them to give us a better answer then we understandi RELEASE JET AFTER JET may of messed up the meta. And we are testing or WORKING on something like when
So again, when sweden has a CAS gap ypu proceed to ignore it but then with other nations that aren’t lacking you bend the rules? Why do we constantly have to deal with 400k rp sinks for 1 modification change where as basically everyone else doesn’t? Why are the AJ37 and AJS37 not foldered? Should we expect the F18 to be added way later when its already dead on arrival should we expect another 400k sink without foldering?
Again its like you guys purposely do these things so i can’t actually trust you guys which sucks but i would like a serious answer.
1 Like
I’m pretty sure 2S6 is 11.0 and Pantsir is 12.0. Smaller gap than that, but something the Tor would definitely help with for sure.
1 Like
I know I was the one who made the bug report and suggestion. Hopefully it will be seen soon as it gives the Americans something more akin to the Kh-38MT. What about Harpoons though? Is it possible to see those this update?
1 Like
This ship is HMS Royal Sovereign later in life. Its the same ship, not a different ship.
This is a tad overexaggerated when in the same update HMS Rodney came, closely followed by HMS Warspite. Lets please keep things constructive here and not get off the rails too much.
A huge problem exists in meta made worse by including more and more advance jets. This canned answer we Know we messed up but we are working on it but we cant give you a actually time frame to expect us to fix this issue
Is this planned for all US aircraft that can use it (F-15E, F-16C, AV-8B+, A-10C) or just the hornet?
Also, do you guys plan to give EGBU to US? Iirc, we did use them, and they are also apparently compatible with F-117.
As always, thanks for all you say/do
2 Likes
Players have begged for a Rapier for years at this point, I know you’re only being told to say this as you’re the PR guy (I feel bad for you taking the brunt of annoyed players endlessly I hope they pay good) but getting it this late into the games existence and at a BR where its fullest lineups are flooded with other recent SPAA additions doesn’t seem like good execution.
we had one yes, but what about 2nd breakfast rapier xD
Sorry got a chance at a LotR reference, had to take it. These chaps need to calm on Indian sam stuff lol.
2 Likes