You should make a report on this to get this added. A report for the Gripen was made and forwarded to the devs already and I’d imagine this would be accepted too.
Both British protectorates
used to for singooore, but british sucked at protecting singapore anyways
Not our fault we conquered 1/3 of the world. And that some nations exported their vehicles. Do you reckon we can claim the MiG-15 since they used a Rolls Royce Nene?
soooooooo you dont like us/ger/ru players asking for this and that for their already fleshed out tree, yet here we have uk players asking for this and that for their fleshed out tree. literally doing the very same thing that you hate the mains for lolol
@Smin1080p_WT
Can we please have MAJOR BR changes for naval. I shouldn’t see battleships in a 6.0 cruiser
1 Like
I mean at this point this is a strawman argument. at least for me i dont condone us/ger/ru players asking for this and that or the whole world. WHy? because their tree doesnt need anymore help and its fleshed out plenty
FOR THE SAME REASON, i also DO not condone or agree uk players asking for the whole world as well. I hate the typical us/ger/ru main doing that. For me to not agree to uk players asking this country or that country is just extension of the same logic here. literally fair.
At least when us mains ask for more additions they mostly ask for their own domestic stuff, mostly
4 Likes
I just want the Gnat and the Hawk… :(
2 Likes
I wonder why, not like they were a British colony and part of the CoN or anything
they were, but then japan happened. Japan took SEA in ww2 by force, by that logic should japan players say : “SEA countries should be in japan tree”?
not to insult, but uk sucked so bad in protecting singapore and that region, Brits didnt even win anything against the japanese as far as that region is concerned
1 Like
With the recent addition of the PL-8B to dev server, do you think that Python-4 should be added under the same treatment that PL-8B recived?
- Add it with Gatewidth IRCCM only (R-73, Magic-2, PL-5E-II, R-27T, etc)
- Add it with Tracking suspension only (9M, AAM-3, 9L/I, etc)
- Do not add it
0
voters
7 Likes
Reports can be made with evidence for any aircraft that do not have the feature, as we explained. However video statements are generally not accepted.
2 Likes
I mean it’s litteraly who have more hour on a plane ans on simulator than on his car that is saying that so…
1 Like
Are reports allowed to be made about missing weapons?
Wait it depends. How much can it pull and can it 180?
Yeah they can be made, might take time to be processed/accepted though.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/eq1ml5W6sNK1
example of mine (my strikemaster minigun pod report)
1 Like
So a former pilot explaining AND showing it is not enought ? Dont take it bad but it’s pretty idiotic to ask for "real " evidence knowing that those aircraft are mostly classified …also question even if we interview one of the creator of the plane and he is saying thay there is indeed an AOA switch ,it wont be enought ??
2 Likes
Did you at least try to make a report or is there any report up made by someone else that has been denied?
I assume its a case of former pilots can misremember/not actually be a former pilot/be talking crap.
Its why generally speaking, you shouldnt use the history channel as a source/take anything face value within the last 20 years or so for example, they find “enough” tankers/pilots/historians willing to say the most crazy stuff.
If they cite their sourcing and information its different ofc, but “pilot” isnt usually enough for most things to be 100%.
so you dont agree to usa players asking for more stuff so that this game can display the big might of us military.
but you want us to know about uk , their might and their colonization, so much so that you would condone/ agree to putting every remotely related country to uk?
the irony…
3 Likes
Well for this no … because i thought gaijin would be smart enought to add it by themselves… and i have a good reason for not trying yet it’s because i dont want to waste energy just like i did in the past ,finding every single clue possible about the subject but official docs either because they are non existant or not public …
I done like 3 or 4 reports like that all not accepted just because they felt like it .
Well at least I live in you head rent free :P
1 Like
Just testing it on the Su-30SM full real with manual SAS it seems to be able to pull AoA similar to the AoA override however it is a lot less stable and often time you just stall out and fall upside down without being able to recover.
Using the override and manual SAS it is able to pull far past 90 degrees of AoA whilst far less stable.
The best use I have found is with SAS dampening. You can pull all the AoA you want whilst still being somewhat in control with the override on.
I think it would need testing by someone more knowledgeable.
1 Like
This pilot left the army a few years ago … + he keep talking about the subject on his youtube channel so even he is not a pilot anymore i guess we can call it an expert .