Did not realise that, figured it was just gaijin being wierd.
This is why you dont use wiki (and only read the first paragraph):D
1 Like
Really? That’s the first time I’ve heard that
A general rule of thumb seems to be that ASRAAM has up to 6x the effective range of Sidewinder in the front aspect and 3x in the rear aspect.
3 Likes
thats bloody incredible.
1 Like
Evil British Grin
1 Like
Interesting, what website did you grab that from? Does it have a link to the photographs of the mock-ups it mentions?
That’s from Wikipedia.
bro its wikipedia lol
Oh… guess I won’t be learning much from that as their sources go to nowhere lol
1 Like
the one issue with wiki is that they link sources which nobody can proof read
3 Likes
Well, when it comes to military stuff it’s usually either books that may or may not include reliable information (cough Janes cough) or webpages that have been taken down long ago and also may or may not include reliable information lol
basically where WT used to get its info when it didn’t just steal from WoT (panther 2 cough cough)
Fair lol
Anyways, I’m looking at the listed source for the photographs on the wayback machine right now and there sadly are no pics :(
Guess I did learn something from this though, the SRAAM is not the Taildog, but rather a younger relative of the Taildog
1 Like
Wingtip pylons??
Sign me up!!
1 Like
Unironically shouldve been the eastern EF counterpart in WT
1 Like
In an alternate universe where WT exists and contains vehicles like the EAP maybe lol
1 Like
I sure hope so.
All these amazing projects just being restricted by gaijins’ “standards”…
You are the one neo.
I want the fugly Fo.147 lmao
look upon the jank and weep