damn the one thing that would actually help the british ground line up, welp back to waiting for skysabre I guess
su30mki when
I dont get why people are mad.
OSA is the only way UK can deal with max range drones, including 10km russian ones, and Strela is, well, Strela.
2 Likes
Hopefully it won’t be too long before we see them adopted by India and have them in game
Nuh uh, NUH UH. D:
5 Likes
Then, if ZA-HVM or G6-HVM come, also same br, this is again same situation. In your logic, UK TT also don’t need a Pantsir, ZA TT is enough.
Generally the sentiment seems to come from the misunderstanding that if the Osa was not added, something else (domestic) would have come the same update in its place. Which was not the case.
4 Likes
Why should they cover an allready mentioned vehicle again?
On the Spain thing, its an EC665 Tiger HAD in the end, which was an German/Franco project, France has allready more helis and also an Apache as Premium,
So its just logical that the Spain tiger goes to Germany as an Prem
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT
We all know these leaks are true, they are from “The” source.
But, the strategic bomber thingy.
How is that going to work for other nations beside US, RU and GB?
Most nations haven’t operated these type of vehicles, so they wont get them.
That will even further discourage people of grinding any other nation besides the main four (US, DE, RU, GB).
While also providing even more content for the already high content nations.
Do you know any strategic bombers from Japan, China, Italy, France, Sweden and Israël?
2 Likes
Only the orion can fire off missiles that has a 10km range, and given how prevelant su-25/su-25k is, there are little cases where the orion is an issue.
less annoyed about india more that we are presumably getting a 5th SPAA at 10.0-10.3 when we only have a single IFV past 8.0, again dont get me wrong nice to see the rapier but god I would even love a warrior CTA-40
2 Likes
As i said, 10km russian ones
2 Likes
Watch your words. 9.3 Rapier with Mk.1 only. Have fun.
1 Like
Sigh…
I’m just curious, since adding some types of vehicles the majority didn’t have, will even furthur remove players from already low-playerbase nations.
Since an entire way of playing is going to be limited towards the already high-playerbase nations.
Thus making minor nations even more minor.
1 Like
I thought the ZA-HVM was limited only to 12km? which I agree is still better then the Pantsir but its still far from being on par with the Pantsir
12km is effective range. 15 is max. At 12 you expect to hit something, at 15 if it flies in a straight line.
3 Likes
at least that would be kinda cool lol, (would prefer that since it would give a reason to use it)
I must be the only deranged who actually likes to have more than 1 SAM on the lineups, hahahah.
In China, I have both HQ17 and TOR-M1; and, in Japan, I have both Type 81 (C) and Type 93.
To me, in general, the more (and ideally better) tools to fight C*S, the better.
I guess its better then the 10km of a ADATS but again still far call from the 18km of a pantsir