multi-vehicle SAM, dont be afraid gaijin, DO IT!
4 Likes
Nailed it.
What I hate even more than the concept is how extremely hostile, toxic and personal they get about all of this.
Healthy and constructive disagreements? What’s that? Best to start rambling about “noobs”, “skill issues” and going even personal about it.
10 Likes
i swear the devs team that work on war thunder are 5 seperate department with their own ideas and that no one play the game
4 Likes
My personal belief is that BVVD was playing the game and got mad after a periodic flaring Gripen mopped his SU-27 in game and he instantly nerfed the flares. (This is a joke)
I mean unless it is a KH38MT all you need to do is reposition every 15 secs or so with the pantsir and nothing will be able to hit you.
But with everything else yes the maps are trash.
Maybe soon perhaps. If they indeed add F-2 this update and they want to give it any form of guided cas the only targeting pod it has ever used is Sniper pod. Unless they dont give the F-2 CAS of any kind 🤣
1 Like
Please makes dreams come true
I feel like the THAAD system would be super good because it’ll be able to shot down multiple munitions at a time. Not as good against aircraft but it’ll create a little zone of safety. Also i’m pretty sure most players will be able to hit eastern Anti rad missiles with it.
It’s the russian theater defense that might suffer. It will easily get over loaded with superior anti rad missiles.
1 Like
So definetly will get Litening II pod
1 Like
Well, I’d welcome that addition, as it brings us one step closer to the Harrier GR.9
The pod would probably not be a real improvement anyways, due to how Gaijin determines resolutions
They also need to fix targeting pods. Even more if the sniper comes.
IRL afaik yes, but i think Gaijin just copy pasted the visual of the real stuff, and after all MICA IR is in the files since some times now, so at least this view is ready for that time
Not for soon ingame i will found that strange.
Is there anything wrong with them or is this just about the resolutions being way better than they were IRL?
Nah man, go for the true funi of multi vehicle
xD
5 Likes
Well i’m the case of the lighting the res is worse, but the max range being caped at 20km is also wrong. Makes it a pain in sim
I wanna be able to play as a whole base
1 Like
Eurocopter 665 Tigre “Hélicoptère d’Appui Destruction”/E going to Germany, AS A PREMIUM, is insane. Spanish owned French variant of an Eurotiger going to Germany makes no sense. To add insult to injury, it’s just simply superior to the UHT to boot. How is this justified?
Well, the main use of the Mirage IV was the atomic strike, and their pilots were prepared for a once-in-a-lifetime trip.
It may have fewer payloads than the other bigger strategic bombers (I think its conventional payload is something around 14x 450kg bombs), but its advantage over the others will be its speed.
Unlike the other at high altitude strategical bombers, the Mirage IV was mainly made for low altitude high speed strikes
Litening II or Litening III? Because the only info I can find about the Litening II suggests that its resolution ingame is way better than it should be
The range is mostly an engine limitation tho
As I wrote above, this is extremely difficult on many maps or even impossible.
On many maps there are literally 2-3 places LIMITEDLY suitable for placing SAMs (1 or at best 2 for each team) due to the limited firing sector and radar viewing area.
It reaches the point of idiocy - on the Sweden map with the upper respawn, I have to press my back to the building and catch CAS on mistakes when they move to our half of the map (while my radar does not even see anything except the side of our ground and air respawn).
Let real people working on SAM/SPAA read such nonsense, they will laugh.
1 Like