remember this is okay at 11.3
and this is completely broken at 11.7
5 Likes
Scimitar was part of that club once, fictionally.
I said buff because you need to improve the acceleration of the plane, it doesn’t take speed as in reality, moreover the real engines have 2850 kgf of thrust in the game no, only 2735 kgf…, also it seems heavy to me in the manoeuvred, as far as the weapons are concerned it has already been requested.
However, you did not answer me regarding the BR, of the Mars er, also further question, will you put missiles with irccm? Because 13.0 with only 2 or 4 9 L aim missiles is highly painful
Please don’t avoid all my questions
Thanks
All while shooting out the fcs system on other tanks doesnt even do anything? You would think they would add the change across the board. Also, why is it that the fcs doesn’t determine the traverse,stabiliser and so on? You would think it would have more systems tied to it.
2 Likes
Why don’t the Russian T72, T90, and T80 series have turret baskets? Given that crew members need a place to sit, these tanks should also be equipped with turret baskets. Furthermore, there are pictures showing that the turret baskets are closely integrated with the automatic loaders. When will we see these tanks equipped with these modules
17 Likes
Swedens viggen is stuck with 9ls at 13.0 as well, but this thing isnt even fast so i have no idea why it cant be 12.7. If it were aim120s i would understand but derbys? they are no considered good by anyone.
2 Likes
lmaoooooooo
I love the complete double standard gaijin has, this update is honestly a sad joke and shouldn’t come out in its current state.
2 Likes
I’m readyyyyy
On a sidenote, a Belgian and a Dutch skin on this F-16 would be dope (even if fictional for the Dutch one).
2 Likes
But the viggen can carry 2 9L and 4 120…
@Smin1080p_WT is there any chance we will see the su-33 get it’s anti-ship missile KH-41 this update?
2 Likes
Dont forget MiG-27 at 11.0
IRIS-T SLM datalink shouldn’t disable during terminal guidance // Gaijin.net // Issues
Just ask for them to implement this report
the fact russia gets several 11.0 ARMs while the UK doesnt get a single ARM below 12.3 is so dumb especially when there is literally no shortage of aircraft in game
2 Likes
With everything having it’s placment changed, hopefully the 1A5BE gets moved into the logical line. Example and poll for it found here:
3 Likes
Of course. But the devs said it’s not planned
It would’ve been nice if it had them, though. Russia would finally have a 14.0 jet.
If this is a common reoccurence, then why are they not asking the authors of the related bug-reports whether they can answer certain open questions that come up?
Ofc they may not be able to provide anything further all the time, but they did apparently research the related topic thoroughly enough to get a report on it forwarded…
This should be properly reported here with evidence:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder?from=now%252Fd-6mo&to=now%252Fd
A number of aircraft could receive completely different anti-ship missiles, such as the kh-41, kh-35, and so on, but right now it doesn’t seem to make much sense until the “Nuclear Escalation” mode appears in War Thunder on a permanent basis.
Wondering if this will effect its BR in the future or ammo choices.
This recent major update that’s in development is implementing new mechanics for anti-radiation missiles which also benefits France, but is there any consideration to allowing the Rafale to be able to shoot AASM missiles at radar-emissions?
Rafale’s RWR should be able to create sensor point-of-interest // Gaijin.net // Issues