I agree, but the ALARM would probably be better than the soviet ones. But they should add the AS-37 Martel.
right now we dont know as the ALARM is still just a copy paste AMRAAM, even still the Tornado RET.8 sits at 11.7 with 4 HARMs i dont see why the Tornado GR1 couldnt go to 11.7 with a max of 5 ALARMs
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT
Is there any plan to limit the transmitted image in MITL to the resolution the missile seeker actually has? Because currently you get a high resolution IR image from a missile which usually only have a resolution of 64x64, 128x128 or at most 256x256 pixels, which is unrealistic and makes this mechanic much more powerful than it would really be as you can currently scan the battlefield like looking through a targeting pod.
2 Likes
yeah, like the poor sea harriers which are STILL missing their sea eagles.
2 Likes
Ever heard of “hanging chairs”? They’re fixed to the roof because otherwise a mine detonation under the tank would deliver its force into the crew. These seats are standard for seats in modern IFVs and tanks AFAIK. So the argument that the seats have to be fixed to the floor of a tank is stupid of the BRM…
guys i have a quick question for my grind, should i get the F/A18C Late or F14 to Superhornet?
Hey Smin. Sorry for the random question, but do you happen to have more information (possibly from the devs) on the new armor plates on the SEPv3 turret cheeks?
They are listed as RHA at the moment, which has a 1.00x armor modifier in game, and the thickness is listed as 150mm. However they only offer about 90mm of protection, which is inconsistent with what they should offer if they were 150mm RHA plates. I assume it’s still WiP, but I was just curious.
2 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT Hi smin, hope your Wednesday is treating you well. what is your favourite maritime patrol aircraft and do you happen to know anything about their future in war thunder?
Does Gaijin have the idea of removing six AGM-65D missiles from the pack F-16AM making it only able to carry up to four AGM-65D (G) missiles?
This isn’t the type of mechanism coming to the game this major. Its Anti-Radiation Missiles themselves.
Mine would be the Nimrod, but then again im biased for airliner conversions ))
Currently we dont have anything spesific to announce on them. They are naturally much more niche than standard bombers and most outside of the BR ranges that naval currently allows for.
1 Like
Hey. As far as im aware those plates are still WIP. But its best to report any discrepancy anyway to ensure its properly logged.
1 Like
At the moment its just the interface we currently have, but that could always change in the future.
@Smin1080p_WT Are there any plans for the F-14B to keep the Aim-9L as a secondary weapons option? I’ve been told it’s been completely and entirely removed from its secondary weapons options.
I’m apart of a small community that makes events in War Thunder CDK based off real life combat operations, and having the F-14B only have access to the Aim-9M makes running Desert Storm in a balanced way a whole hell of a lot harder. The aircraft used the missile, can’t it just be added there as a default option for those with the sidewinder modification, like what was done with the Aim-120B for Aim-120C/D carriers? Would I need to write a report for this aircraft to keep the option present? I appreciate your time, thank you!
@Smin1080p_WT
hey smin, i’m curious to know if the french & american H-34s will ever receive the ability to create custom loadouts? they’ve been around for quite a while now and are the only helos that don’t have that ability if i’m not mistaken
They can get worse
new IA 58A pre-order decal: uy_1st_aviation_group_emblem
Are you serious, gaijin? Instead of putting up an Argentinian emblem, you’re going to put up a Uruguayan one?
2 Likes
16 Likes
If this thing comes with a pre-order Uruguayan skin then boy I’m pre-ordering that
You can choose not to buy it.
It could come with a Uruguayan skin for 200g, that would be great.
But it’s an Argentinian plane.