@Smin1080p_WT Is it possible that m 346 receives some buff in flight performance? New weapons? A lower BR in ground and aerial battles? And as a last thing, is it possible to see him armed with anti-ship missiles Mars ER? It would be useful for the Nuclear Thunder
Thanks 🙏
early tonka would be wonderful to have ALARM on. its a mid 1980s missile so its kinda wild to have it trapped so high up, it entered service within 4 years of the AIM-9M
Hmmm… dev server ends tomorrow, but we still haven’t seen fleshed out Abrams (let alone SEPv3), nor complete Leopard 2RI, nor any fixes to CR2, Type 10, Leclerc, etc.
Could extend the dev tbf
its funny in the ARM department the UK should have some of the strongest CAS loadouts with ARMs yet gaijin completely screws over the UK by saying “the tornado GR1 would need up BR and the rest of its kit isnt ready for that”
meanwhile it needs to be up BR to even be used, its such a nothing burger excuse
2 Likes
We dont “buff” flight performance just to clarify. If its underperforming comapred to real information of the real aircraft a report can be made for investigation.
Regarding new weponary, that depends on the outcome of the reports already submitted.
*first dev. i suspect a second one especially from the nuclear mode getting a lot of requests for lower BR brackets and stuff
1 Like
Oh hello moderator, will there be more news for today?
Why is it that only some tanks fcs actually disable anything? NVD on the challenger while on the t90 it does nothing? Also the lack of any batteries in the t90 is also nice, no way to take out its stabiliser and so on…
2 Likes
at this point once the new abrams are here there is zero point to play a challenger 2, they are worse in pretty much every way yet somehow the 2E which is still worse then a 12.0 abrams is 12.7 it makes no sense
if that 2E had come out in any other tree it would be 11.7
5 Likes
its like how the A10 gets AGM 65D at 10.7 but the hawk 200 only gets AGM 65B, and thats two less mavs, while also sacrificing all sidewinders.
britains cas options are very poor for their BRs, the ARMs are following the trend
2 Likes
Sidearm as well perhaps.
1 Like
im replacing my CR2s (other than OES because i was a moron and bought that slop) with the ADF M1a2s as they are actually viable
3 Likes
At least were not the idiot we both know who brought the new challenger pack.
that technically could be on things as low as GR3 harrier. would be an intresting tradeoff, sacrifice what the GR3 does well (top down orbital strikes) for head on trolling or take one of each and pray
The same mockup Hawk 200 airframe that had Sea Eagles also had ALARM mounted on it ^.^
3 Likes
yea im not buying a second one that was advertised with this frame bro. I may be a degenerate but what on earth are we doing here
3 Likes
dont do this to me. i love BAE hawks but hate their missed potential
Just check, the challenger is now in the very niche club of top tier mbts who actually have a power system that disables the fcs and stabliser. That club including the type 10, and thats it lol. The rest have something separate that takes out their powered traverse? How is any of this even remotely consistent and what kind of order is this where the type 10 had it first and the challenger is getting it second…
2 Likes