@Smin1080p_WT The salvo guided weapon mechanic thingy is it meant to be ALL GNSS weapons or only GNSS-Only weapons?
Paveway IVs dont work
@Smin1080p_WT The salvo guided weapon mechanic thingy is it meant to be ALL GNSS weapons or only GNSS-Only weapons?
Paveway IVs dont work
Which are still miles behind the 2A7V. Hell the SEPv3 is still miles behind the 2A7V currently due to Gaijins “creative” implementation.
M829A2 is also supposed to be able to defeat K5, since it was made in direct response to K5. Although A2 is only effective against K5 out to ~1500 yards. M829A3 was designed to be able to counter K5 at any range, since it uses a sacrificial steel tip that detonates the K5 block before it can deform the actual penetrator, as opposed to A2 which was just made reallllllly long so that it still had enough of the penetrator left after going through the era block. In game, A2 is not even able to defeat K5 point blank.
its gajin, if they can they will go the easy route its nearly the same as the german one, they can reuse 90% of it
Yep! That’s well reflected ingame; at optimal angles and short ranges, M829A2 can go through K-5-armored tanks, but not reliably and let alone at range/angle.
On the other hand, M829A3 has a much easier time slicing through them!
taking bets if they implement it for DM53 as well, we only gave them 10 sources, multiple being primary
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/gcvaeG1VZj44
And @Smin1080p_WT responding here because you lcosed the thread
This is MODE 3 This is NOT MODE 2. I was ONLY proposing the Introduction of MODE 2 which is less powerful than ANY LOAL missile being added in this update or ANY FnF weapon we already have in-game
Why you and the devs wont stop mixing up Mode 2 and Mode 3 is totally and completely beyond me.
Not quite. Its been a while since I’ve tested so things could have changed, but last time I tested, A2 could not reliably penetrate a K5 armored tank even at point blank range. And on the rare occasion it did, it has so little penetration left in it that it would be stopped by the driver’s face.
I have important mission for those of you on devserver. Someone please test if new anti radiation missiles can be used to destroy radar equipped helicopters like Mi-28NM, AH-64E and Z-10ME. It would be great win for CAP players if yes.
how smin is gonna be posted up after seeing this message

All of the modes are understood. These were points rating to all aspects of Brimstone and why its other modes have not been introduced.
smin can you reply to my previous post on the implementation of more spice bombs for the typhoons
Honestly;
I get why they did not want to implement M829A3 and Anti-Era tips UNTIL NOW.
Until now, Russia still relied a lot on lower BR K-5-armored tanks for the very Top BR lineup.
You had T-80BVM and T-90M, yes, but then you had to rely on T-72B3s, T-80Us, T-90As…
However, now they’ve got 3x Relikt-armored tanks, with the second T-90M.
Therefore, it’s now only natural and not so unbalanced anymore that the lower BR K-5 ones begin being less relevant at the very top BR.
So?
Brimstone FnF can ONLY be added as Mode 3 and not Mode 2?
We have no plans for it this major.
i mean most our sources say DM53 is made to defeat double era like relikt.
But not like gajin will care
No. Mode 2 is impacted by these factors too. Not just Mode 3.
But why is it that Brimstone capabilities in mode 3 are used as the only argument not to add mode 2? It makes absolutely no sense.
These are not just factors for mode 3, but mode 2 also.