All of the modes are understood. These were points rating to all aspects of Brimstone and why its other modes have not been introduced.
smin can you reply to my previous post on the implementation of more spice bombs for the typhoons
Honestly;
I get why they did not want to implement M829A3 and Anti-Era tips UNTIL NOW.
Until now, Russia still relied a lot on lower BR K-5-armored tanks for the very Top BR lineup.
You had T-80BVM and T-90M, yes, but then you had to rely on T-72B3s, T-80Us, T-90As…
However, now they’ve got 3x Relikt-armored tanks, with the second T-90M.
Therefore, it’s now only natural and not so unbalanced anymore that the lower BR K-5 ones begin being less relevant at the very top BR.
So?
Brimstone FnF can ONLY be added as Mode 3 and not Mode 2?
We have no plans for it this major.
i mean most our sources say DM53 is made to defeat double era like relikt.
But not like gajin will care
No. Mode 2 is impacted by these factors too. Not just Mode 3.
But why is it that Brimstone capabilities in mode 3 are used as the only argument not to add mode 2? It makes absolutely no sense.
These are not just factors for mode 3, but mode 2 also.
How so? Mode 2 does not allow LOAL, or firing without direct LoS. You need to lase the target first and then hand over guidance to the mmW seeker after launch. It would be a sidegrade to current FnF munitions at best, depending on how strong the mmW guidance is.
1 Like
so not only are we getting nothing for brimstones were also stuck with the lowest spice bomb count and the challengers got turret baskets AND the tornado gr1 wont get ALARM for “balance” wow this is terrible
This isn’t just about LOAL.
Points 2 and 3 apply to modes 2 and 3. Not just 3.
@Smin1080p_WT Are there any plans to add more radiation missiles to the dev server, like the AGM-45 Shrike?
1 Like
Please make a report with your and the developers can check things out properly.
Could the Leopard 2A7V get its own DM73? Since the Abrams are getting their own M829A3s?
1 Like
This is Mode 3 only:
- Missiles are launched in an area and home in on any target within that area, including allies. Target acquisition occurs over a large area. Brimstone cannot discriminate in many cases and can destroy allies.
SAL is blocked by Smoke , so mode 2 would also be blocked smoke, unless smoke was deployed after lock on.
- There are significant gaps in the ability to evade these missiles. Regular smoke screens don’t provide coverage from its radar. Only some specific smoke screens with chaff reflectors, but they’re experimental and very limited.
Hu? This makes no sense, because nothing on the enrivronment blocks any current FnF except putting a building between you and the missile and Brimstones would be equally affected by this. And why are ARMs fine and not Brimstones in this regard too?
- We have a “sterile” jamming environment; objects on the map that would actually disrupt lock-on have no effect on the radar seekers of missiles.
So none of this makes any sense and it sounds a bit like the whole “Tornado GR1 has weaker engines to create a feeling of progression” nonsense or the more recent “Tornado GR1 cant get any ARM so that it stays at 11.3 in GRB, despite there being no 11.3 lineup for it”
1 Like
so now you want dm73 when dm53 is still the best top tier round? the german main jokes write themself
How much spawn points do new anti radiation missiles cost to use? Does anyone know?