What kills all the ratels for me is the piss poor mobility, can’t rat it up if you get stuck on hills. Probably why the ZT3A2 is my favorite of the bunch spend most of your time in it stationary
I find the Bushmasters in general (the 25, 30, and 35) to be very average, They work well enough when you have the mobility to exploit sides though.
Took me a hot minute to realise you mean the Type 87 RCV cause I’ve been stock grinding the CTWV RCV lately
If the CV9030 had the CTWV mobility then yes id say it is a good vehicle but it doesn’t unfortunately which makes it imo more 8.7 esq in tier since it imo is abysmal to play
I have like 6 tanks left on sweden to spade theyvare like the leos 122 and the strf 9040 and the ikv 90 105. Im spaded up to rank IV air wise slowly working to all spaded vehicles then im in to spade all of japan and France
It doesn’t help that most autocannons just have horrible spalling. The RARDEN has decent spalling but that might change soon. CTWV isn’t amazing to play either because of the bushmaster (which has low firerate).
Idk i never see 9030 players do good, probably why i see more Leo marksman players since they are a decent IFV unlike the 9030, crazy that the only decent IFV on sweden until 9.7 is a SPAA and a worse BMP 2 with 1 belt of APDS lmao.
People do better in vehicles than others, i like playing the Type 87 RCV(p) to 9.3 where ive pulled a few nukes in it while others hate it. To each their own silly sets of skills.
Gun-only IFVs generally place much more emphasis on good positioning. It is possible that the players you’ve seen are still getting used to such playstyle.