We need CV90 variants with upgrade engines,enhanced turret and SPIKE missiles.
WHERE IS MY UPGRADED CV90’S GAIJIN, WHEREEEE
1 Like
I still cannot find any information literally anywhere even Swedish websties that say the BILL lacks a full 2 plane STAB at all speeds
Most camos/liveries for Chinese vehicles look wack. For ground vehicles the digital camo is way too bright. The green is much more subdued in real life.
1 Like
Itd also help if basically all of the Digital camos werent restricted to crate skins
Ever since i buildied my own pc i stopped buying ingame camos, user skins are much better than them.
I just love historical and accurate skins over some wacky ingame camos.
Iirc the BILL was made using a 9040A, as it was just a testbed they put a Psuedo stabilizer on it. That box on the fron right of the turret. It definitely shouldn’t have a full stabilizer from that box and irl it would handle worse than in game. It should slightly stop the bounce of the gun but not to the extent in game. So its actually better in game for balance.
Ahhh I see that makes a lot more sense
Love the music for this video
3 Likes
I love that video so much lmao
I’ve always quite liked the 9030 tbh, I would personally peg maybe the Ratel-20 (it’s only saving grace is the Milan launcher lmao) or the BTR80s as the worst IFVs in WT
Hey dont bully my precious 9030, it treated me pretty well :D
I actually liked the Ratel but maybe its cause i played it like a very large rat driving a safari bus. Imo the damage and fire rate of the 9030 is what kills it for me. Poor fire rate and lack luster spall. Its why i prefer the RCV with the 25mm, sure its not stabilized and has worse pen but faster fire rate more than makes up for it. Its why i jate the 9030 because if you don’t do something within the first or 2nd shot you’re dead, you also domt have the fire rate to break barrels in time for the most part.
Lies
I will say ive heard almost nothing good from Bushmaster 30mm which scares me because my beloved Type 24 will have only that
2 Likes
No i actually quite enjoyed it when i was playing with it, sometimes it made me angry tho :D
My blood boils playing that vehicle, literally would rather play the RCV with stock belts at 11.7 over the 9030
Sorry to hear that you had bad experience with 9030, personally i didnt have too many issues even as stock, APDS seemed spall a lot compare to APFSDS tho.
The only good 9.3 vehicle on sweden is the T72 i despise 9.3 sweden with every fiber of my being
Only saving graces being the Strv 104/5 imo
What kills all the ratels for me is the piss poor mobility, can’t rat it up if you get stuck on hills. Probably why the ZT3A2 is my favorite of the bunch spend most of your time in it stationary
I find the Bushmasters in general (the 25, 30, and 35) to be very average, They work well enough when you have the mobility to exploit sides though.
Took me a hot minute to realise you mean the Type 87 RCV cause I’ve been stock grinding the CTWV RCV lately
1 Like