What we doin toaday?
Also, noone is forcing them to play it again in another tree if they don’t want to. But to people who do play that tree, having more options available to them is only a good thing, ‘copy and paste’ or not.
1 Like
I already made Bug report for it, dont know if it counts as suggestion.
Already sent you through PM so you can check to see if its acceptable.
Arguing about copy&paste, drinking coffee and worshipping santa.
2 Likes
Suggestion, as of
But bug reports can be passed as suggestions. Dunno the criteria tho.
1 Like
It’s not my stuff.
thats not the point.
Unique and indiginous vehicles are being reserved for premiums, battlepasses and events.
While C&P gets to the TT.
I dont like playing 20 M60’s, 15 T-54’s while i know there are dozens of unique vehicles that could have replaced them.
1 Like
Kfir 2000 from passed for consideration
Personally, I think Kfir C.10 prototype (Kfir 2000) would be the first fighter aircraft with active radar homing missile for israel
Kfir C.10 equipped Rafael Litening III targeting pod ?
The last thing piqued my interest. Its not something that happens everyday.
1 Like
Again no one is forcing you too, don’t like it don’t play it
C.10 has Litening 3, yes.
Never fielded with French AF
Devil worshipping requires too much to prepare. Santa just needs milk and cookies.
1 Like
i do have to play them if i want something new.
Merkava’s E.G.
Yeah but the guy above was talking about taking Israel down to rank I (as was I in response).
You ain’t gonna see any more M60’s / T54’s at I, II and III lol.
1 Like
2 Likes
No, you will see another dozen shermans and british planes.
And i’d absolutely love every second of it.
2 Likes
It’s what they used, it’s part of their history Israel didn’t have an industry at the point of their release in 48.
Although seeing more British planes would make the tree more alive in the early ranks
3 Likes
Other features are not modelled correctly either.
Hell we just received Brimstone with it’s key feature missing while still accurately portrayed as far as I’m aware.
Since M2KD doesn’t pack an air to air radar it would not be as efficient with MICA as 5F would be.
Isn’t the seeker range on R-27ET gimped also?
In game MICA IR would likely be somewhat of an R-27T/R-73 combination.
Can the M2KD even launch it behind itself? Irl even 5F could not since it did not have a HMS in service as far as I’m aware. So if it was added now it would still be performing differently than it would on Rafale.
What makes you think IRIS-T would not be “gimped” to the same extend?
On Tornado it would not nearly be as dangerous as it is on Eurofighter for example.
I do not see any issue for future additions (planes) either.
It could perhaps be better to implement some of these missiles early to have them sorted out by the time when long anticipated fighters are going to receive them. Just look at R-73…
MiG-29 9.12 is still stuck with R-27ER/T it never had without access to R-73.
I’d imagine Eurofighter and Rafale to be implemented without such missiles in their first iterations anyway.
1 Like