Still waiting for the gripen to have Krig instead of krieg
Or just unnecessary BR changes
(Skink going from 4.7 to 5.0 and then to 5.3 for no reason apart from "I can’t pen the SPAA as a Plane :( "
5 Likes
Yeah, i hate when reports get accepted and are left un fixed for months, even stuff like bugs that just nerf tanks get left without being fixed
there are actually changes in the cockpit tho and I got pinned from all sides by players, devs and mods after saying it’s the wrong cockpit because this is apparently the correct cockpit
Yea,No… its still missing the English HUD and also some other changes
sigh I’ll check the manual rq
Subpar RWR is what I consider its biggest weakness, lack of HMD less so, there are also AV-8Bs who are subsonic with no DL. But on the other hand the RWR is really a big problem since it is more than likely to either face said AV-8Bs or KWS/J-8F in higher altitudes.
Which one do you have?
I mean at the very least if it is a copy of the Su-22 it could be like the JBG-77 or MFG-28. Cant find the details on hind but it points to the 5th combat helicopter regiment which operates Mi-24P.
wingtip EW jammers for the su-34
west German, Post upgrade the last one
It’s declassified and I got it from an angry person during the update in which the 29G was implemented
but sadly, I’ll have to check it later when I’m home because my phone can’t view .rar files
Can you show me where in that article specifically it says the ASSTA1 used them…?
You can’t, because nowhere in that article does it say the ASSTA1 could use them, it just says that they successfully tested them.
Article is from 2009, development of ASSTA3 started in ~2008 and Germany was the first customer of those specific Boeing LJDAMS.
IF they tested them on an ASSTA variant in 2008-2009, it would’ve been the ASSTA2, as that upgrade came out already.
1 Like
These cool data card customizations can be displayed after defeating enemies, and at the end of the battle, the high-contribution player’s data card screen will be displayed, which is the selling point of the high-priced package.
It would be cool if gaijin could add a custom system like the BF series.
Players who are not interested in this content can opt for the lower-priced “Pure Vehicle”, which is just a Premium Vehicle and does not contain any other content.
Idk sometimes the radar is very finicky, ive lost lock from someone heading towards me and dropping chaff, other times the radar just wont lock despite perfect conditions, i think it may be better than the J8F in the missile barge section but worse overall since you wont be able to ID targets. Stock grind i feel is gonna be pretty bad if they give it RB24J’s lol.
Still remember playing the D at 12.0 when the F16 came out and needing to grind with 2 rb24j
Mine is different, I believe
Current Di cockpit is exactly what regular D should have in game. Not really inaccurate on Di since difference comes in english/imperial labels. About HMD on D model - its not exactly missing but could be added the same way Mirage 2000 got its HMD. JA37D tested it so all versions based on it could also receive it in game (that is D and both Di’s).
watch it go to 13.3 if it gets HMD
If I understand correctly, Gaijin expects customers to pay €90 for a rank 9 aircraft when it becomes available.
Simply because it will be a rank 9 vehicle?
My question is whether Gaijin plans to lower prices so that future buyers do not have to spend up to €100 for a premium pack.
I can’t help but compare Gaijin’s paid vehicles to those in DCS, and I mean no offence to Gaijin’s 3D modellers—their work is great. However, the models do not match those in DCS. Not in the level of detail nor level of functionality.
This is solely a comparison of the vehicle models, not the games themselves.
It is questionable to justify an €80 price tag based solely on the vehicle’s rank, and the bonus Premium Time, Golden Eagles, title, and decal do not add much value.
2 Likes