That line has been there for as long as we’ve had missiles in game.
1 Like
Yep, it refers to the shape of the whole beam generated, that is cone.
What we have now are just Chinese vehicles that service in Pakistan, can’t be a proof of a sub.
if this goes to China, it can be see as a comfirm of Pakistan sub I think
I hope Litening III from Tornado GR.4 instead CLDP, Litening II and LANTIRN AN/AAQ-14 targeting pod for JAS39 Gripen C, AMX A-11 and F-15I Ra’am
Sadly, Now I busy but open war thunder dev server 3 hours
😯
Now gajin not confirmed this attack helicopter
@Smin1080p_WT hey there i have two questions for you if you are willing to answer them.
do i have to own the KV-7 to participate in the IS-7 event?
And: Why just copy paste the Di? When the JA 37D IR-OTIS version could have been the TT version and the Di being the Prem version.
Gives a bit of originality you know. and the IR-OTIS is a very interesting prototype.
It’s a Mk.4
1 Like
They’re GE premiums (unless you want to wait for the 5 millenias that it takes to research one) that don’t go on sale and for which you need to grind modules and buy a talisman, they’re the perfect money-making vehicles
(And don’t tell little Timy about research effectiveness dropping when you have more than 1 tier difference, else he won’t use his mom’s credit card as much)
It was only a one-off prototype which tested Meteor aswell so consider it as possible event vehicle in the future. Di is a much better option for the techtree.
And the IR-OTIS can be added in the future as well. Its not one or the other.
1 Like
Yes, this will all be explained in the in-game event description.
Feel free to submit a suggestion for the aircraft or leave feedback for it in the update changelog discussion. However this doesn’t seem like something suitable to the main tree on the surface.
4 Likes
Hey. If we have new news on any subjects on the Dev server to share, we for sure will.
Right now it’s still open and the Devs are still reviewing feedback, actioning reports and continuing to work on the update itself.
3 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT Are you able to bump these bug reports so that the devs take a look at them? The issues of HUDs missing radar symbology has been going on for a while but these reports don’t seem to have been looked at in some time. Missing HUD radar symbology is a massive issue for Sim players and it would be nice to see atleast some of these get fixed.
AV-8B Plus
J-10A and JF-17
JA37D/C (Also Di on Dev server)
It would be especially nice if the Ja37 report would be worked on given that the JA37Di is intended to come in the next major update
3 Likes
Hey. We will take a look at them, but any HUDs not already planned for the update or already in progress likely will not be possible for this major. The team already have existing tasks there for HUD updates. Some of which are already on Dev or in progress.
So it is being considered?
As I said, the Devs are reviewing feedback and reports from the Dev server as a whole. That was not spesific to any one part of the update. Simply we don’t have answers to every subject currently that we haven’t already answered on stream / here.
understood
Sounds like a no tbh
I get that they might be getting worked on but each of these reports were made when the aircrafts first came out. Why not finish the aircraft before adding them? Like it took the bullet count being off by 1 in the AV-8B Plus HUD nearly a year after the AV-8B Plus was first added. It just seems that most of the issues would be fixed quicker if they were worked on when first reported, not kick it down the road to solve in the future.
By ignoring simple issues for months/years it just creates a backpiling of issues which take longer and longer to fix.