it is precisely comporable
Yamato vs Scharnhorst would be like Type-10 vs a PzIII.
It’s not comparable whatsoever.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Or like a type 10 vs a leo 2a7
The type 10 which knowingly nerfed and the leo 2a7 is still the most broken mbt. But yeah giving japan the yamato in naval is SO SO Much worse.
If you legitimately believe Scharnhorst vs Yamato would be a fair fight then you’re beyond reasoning with.
6 Likes
If you believe it is any less reasonable then adding multipe top tier leos to one nation no credible air and the inclusion of faster and more deadly jets and you think this is unfair your kidding yourself
The yamato would be powerful BUT NO MORE THEN A LEO 2 whatever is in ground or a f-14 yeeting phoenixs at you
Honestly, and I don’t mean this disrespectfully, but you’d have to be legitimately clueless about ships to not understand the difference here.
A skilled Type-10 player can still easily destroy a 2A7.
In Naval, skill is hardly a factor. It’s often just a case of biggest guns and armour = win. And Yamato has, by a considerable margin, the best of both of those.
4 Likes
It depends where they stored ammunition on Yamato? Guns will have the worst dispersion… you can be sure about that.
And you won’t be able to angle it effectively because of angled plates(tiger 1p situation)
Also it’s all or nothing armor, so no plates behind the main belt.
And there gonna be a lot dangerous guns. So I don’t think Yamato will be that good. Should be a solid ship, but not OP.
Yeah so can a skilled NAVAL PLAYER kill a yamato, A unskilled leo 2 can kill a type 10 a freaking sherman from the FRONT CAN KILL A TYPE 10
Playing in a leo doesnt require great skill, It is pretty much the most domainate tank in game. It take hits and has the highest pen round the most spall . Its fast and its turret rotation is among the top
It wouldn’t be OP if things ships of the Iowa, Vanguard, Bismarck type generation were already in game, and potentially things like Montana and Lion etc were added along side it.
But this guys not arguing that, he wants Yamato before any of that, which is absurd.
1 Like
While I agree Yamato is VERY unecessary right now (We just got Mustu AND Amagi lol)
You cant say “incontestable dominance” as if the Scharn hasnt ruled the game since its been added
1 Like
A skilled naval player can kill the YAMATO BRO ITs a skill issue bro
Scharnhorst has and that’s a problem, but to add Yamato in this current meta would be a Scharnhorst dominance times a million.
5 Likes
I agree for sure but Gaijin doesnt see it that way which is the bigger problem
1 Like
So we can only allow GERMANS to have naval and tank domaince RIGHT
Mate we just got both of the only 16" gunned ships in the game with a 20 sec reload what else do we need?
2 Likes
RUSSIA SPAA DOMAINCE america air JAPAAN NOOOO YOU dont get the yamato THAT WOULD BE UN FAIR