the 6 that were actually made, yeah
It isn’t, though. There are many fourth gen airframes better than it.
Lion-class was laid down but canceled, fully addable in game.
im not saying UK BBs didnt get refits, but that Morvan initially failed to account for the pretty big refits a lot of US BB got for ww2
In any case.
“US gets more than the UK because it has more to add”
does not apply to naval.
UK has either more or equal to the US. and thats just looking at BBs
3 Likes
1 Like
true, at least for BB, but most of the examples of US getting stuff are not naval, and the US does just have way more stuff outside of naval
But not to say there arent as many additions possible. At top tier, maybe not, but they could probably add equal number of vehicles to most nations for the next few years without running out anytime soon.
If nothing else, many are misisng reasonably easy C&Ps like RAF Sabres or proper bomber variant of the Mosqutio
The excuse, US gets more stuff because it made more stuff, just isnt entirely fair. Especially when there is SOOOOO much missing
1 Like
well lets say they added one of the 15 inch armed ships each update since hood was added we would have only just run out
of battleships anyway, plenty of Frigates, Destroyers and Cruisers Id love to see
i mean i could make many arguments for the seeming forgotten US cold war jets and all the ww2 varaints present in other trees but not US,but yeah both tech tree misisng lot of stuff that shouldve/could come
Last year, Britain barely gotten any aircraft whilst the US got at least 1 sometimes 2 per update. Was frustrating, Especially when options were available.
And at the moment, when the US has nearly double and Japan has double the number of Rank VI ships. again, kinda annoying.
Especially in Naval, should be added far more evenly to all nations, no reason why US, Japan, Germany and the UK at the very least couldnt remain nearly equal on Rank VI ships for the time being. France and Italy could probably stay pretty close quite easily.
This, I just want to see some Caproni planes while US and SU TTs are getting top tier jets from their conveyor.
1 Like
I believe I’ve said this before, but if a nation doesn’t have a top-tier addition that fits now
Go older WW2 and the early Cold War has options(and a lot of them), and at worse a C&P will do, even more so if they were essential/a back bone during their time, like the UK’s M4A4s.
1 Like
Its unironically one of the few times we could see a Canadian Aircraft in-game (yes I know the F-18 is American but you get what I mean), because if not, then we’d have to wait for the CF-100 series of jets (Mega copium for CF-105 Avro Arrow) (CF-100s were already passed for consideration if I recall)
2 Likes
Yeah… I dont often play lower stuff, so still want to see higher stuff, but you dont even need to go that old, things like the Hawk, Arrow, more hunter Variants, Sea Vixen, etc. Would all be really good
2 Likes
Yeah tbh I find the Skink would’ve been perfectly fine at 4.7, as Britain does (or used to, I haven’t been keeping track) have a 4.7 lineup, so the Skink going from 4.7 all the way to 5.3 was pointless and just appeals to the CAS players crying "I can’t open the ARMOURED SPAA, Gaijin please nerf :( "
1 Like
There is that as well. But its more the fact we got 2x SPAA within about a month of each other, for the same BR and what? a year on? there is still a gap between 5.3 and 8.3
Its just insane to me that we have 2x 5.3s and 3x 8.3s but not a single SPAA for 6-7
3 Likes
rather have australian f18 for US as it presents a more unique armament option and at least the CF-18 was made in canada partially, the australian f18 are US made
1 Like
I know it would be really niche, but for some reason I really want that for Sim
1 Like